There was no recession in the
United Kingdom at the time of the last General Election. Yet still we are told
that George Osborne is an economic genius as surely as he is the strategic
genius who delivered the Conservative non-majority, followed by this year’s local
election results.
We have also been told, by every
government for 30 years, that we can have full employment or low inflation, but
not both. So how come, and not exactly for the first time during that period,
we now have desperately high unemployment and desperately high inflation
simultaneously? I am reminded of the not unrelated argument, occasionally still
trotted out, that minimum wage provision would destroy jobs, making low wages
the condition of low unemployment. It always rang more than a little hollow
here in the North East, with both the lowest wages and the highest unemployment
in the country. Here in County Durham, we had both the lowest wages and the
highest unemployment of the lot. I know. Imagine that.
With even the meaningless jibe
that Ed Miliband was not as popular as his party now blown out of the water,
the time is ripe to insist on the successful combination of full employment
with low inflation. A strong financial services sector with a strong food
production and manufacturing base, and with the strong democratic
accountability of both. A leading role on the world stage with a vital
commitment to peace, including a complete absence of weapons of mass
destruction. Academic excellence with technical proficiency. Superb and
inexpensive public transport with personal freedom and with close-knit rural
communities. Visible and effective policing with civil liberty. And very high
levels of productivity with the robust protection of workers, consumers,
communities and the environment, including powerful workers’ representation at
every level of corporate governance.
In a number of other Commonwealth
and European countries, these combinations are taken for granted. Or they were
until recently, in much happier times. Like a proper rail network, in fact. We
need to renationalise
the railways, uniquely without compensation in view of the manner of their
privatisation, as the basis for a national network of public transport free at
the point of use, including the reversal of bus route and rail line closures
going back to the 1950s. Those trains need to be run on electricity, produced
domestically and not least from our vast reserves of coal, rather than on oil,
which has to be imported, and that often from unsavoury and unstable
petrostates in the Gulf and elsewhere.
Only public ownership can deliver this. Public ownership is of course British ownership, and thus a safeguard of national sovereignty. It is also a safeguard of the Union in that it creates communities of interest across the several parts of the United Kingdom. Publicly owned concerns often even had, and could have again, the word “British” in their names.
Ed Miliband and Jon Cruddas, over to you.
Jon Cruddas:
ReplyDelete“Lets be pretty blunt about this. I come to this job – a generous invite from our leader to participate in the shadow cabinet – with a fair degree of baggage. I fervently believe in a lot of things, right? And I still do. But, my job is more of a secretarial job across the party. It would be wrong to see it simply as an exercise in ensuring that the party says what I think. Because I actually think – I’ll be completely honest about this – I don’t want the party to think what I think, because I don’t think it would win if it did, right? This is not an indulgent exercise to try and make sure the Shadow Cabinet takes my views on things, because I don’t think that’s necessarily the most successful route to victory.”
http://labourlist.org/2012/08/duty-obligation-and-the-labour-party-the-jon-cruddas-interview/
And if you believe that...
ReplyDeleteYou have either never been politically active or not for very long, have you? You don't know the code. This little excerpt is a masterclass in it.
The Lady Harriet's days are numbered, so will Jon get Deputy Leader or will it go to St. Tom the Murdoch-Slayer?
ReplyDeleteOne hears both, of course.
ReplyDelete