But The Very Reverse

Well, the Holy Father was never going to please the BBC, which honestly believes that the Catholic Church should "ordain" women, and that the Latin and certain other Churches should end the discipline of prestly celibacy, purely and simply because the BBC says so. Indeed, Auntie sincerely cannot cope with the fact that anyone dares defy her over this, or indeed over anything else.

As for someone like Colm O'Gorman, has anyone ever been charged in relation to the act against him? Has he ever even named his alleged assailant? And how else would he make a living, if it were ever shown (not easy to do, I grant you) that no such assault ever took place? Bear in mind that, since he claims to have been 14 at the time, the act in question would either have been perfectly legal, or else its illegality on other grounds would have been almost impossible to prove, if the Church's enemies, so smug and yet so screechy, had had their way. O'Gorman calls his organisation "One In Four", yet most people in the Irish Republic were educated by the Church and simply never heard of any of this. In several countries, professional criminality, such as would cause a witness's evidence to laughed out in any other situation, has been held up as proof positive that the professional criminal is entitled to a large financial settlement.

Speaking of professional criminality, Alfred C Kinsey was pre-eminent among the sexual psychopaths who avowedly set up the sexology industry, from scratch, in order to supplant the Judaeo-Christian sexual ethic. They fabricated research, and relied heavily on current and former prostitutes, and on convicts. Thence the oft-quoted figure of ten per cent as the number of men who have had a homosexual experience, usually exaggerated further into the notion that one tenth of the population "is homosexual" (which no one is - acts, not persons, are homosexual or heterosexual). On the same figures, one man in twelve has committed bestiality. Is one twelfth of the population zoosexual, or zoophile, or whatever the word is? And even if they are, then so what?

Kinsey held that children in the earliest stages of infancy could experience orgasm. How, exactly, was such "research" conducted? He taught child sexual abuse techniques to the Gestapo. He filmed himself raping his wife and the wives of his staff. He circumcised himself without anaesthesia, and hung himself by the testicles from a pole. He was a devotee of the Satanist Aleister Crowley, acting out Crowley's teaching that pederasty was a laudable form of human sacrifice. Kinsey and his followers were largely funded by the pornography racket and other organised vice.

So there you are. Practically the only views any longer permitted to be expressed about sex are based on fraudulent research and extreme criminality carried out by a clique of sexual psychopaths. Unsurprisingly, adherence to a model designed by and for sexual psychopaths has resulted in a massive increase in sexual psychopathology. Yet that is the only model for the training of anyone who needs a certain number of credits in "sex education" in order to qualify as anything.

Kinsey and his followers had created an intellectual climate conducive to the likes of those who frequented The Stonewall Inn and who founded the North American Man/Boy Lovers' Association (NAMBLA). Just as the entirety of sexology goes back to Kinsey, so the entirety of homosexualism goes back to the buggery of boys as young as eight, if not younger. Thus, here in Britain, homosexualism has organised around demands for apparently endless reductions in the age of consent, as well as around equally Kinseyian calls for the legal, social and cultural legitimisation of sadomasochism, "transgender" activities, substance abuse, every degree of promiscuity consistent with physical possibility, hardcore pornography, and sex in public places.

Particularly in North America, but therefore with considerable consequences elsewhere, the Catholic Church of the late 1960s and early 1970s lost confidence. This resulted from the misappropriation of Vatican II's name by pre-existing secularising tendencies in the Western world, rather than from anything in the Conciliar documents themselves, the definitive interpreters and implementers of which are in fact the late and current Popes. This loss of confidence made the American Catholic Church, which might have held the line against Kinsey and then against Stonewall and NAMBLA, susceptible to those twin forces of evil. So the views and methods of Kinsey and his disciples were incorporated into the training of priests and into the selection of candidates. At the time, the advocates of sex between adult men and adolescent boys were the most vocal of the lobbies looking to Kinsey, and so they had the most influence over that training and selection.

We all now what happened next, although it is worth pointing out that the acts which have brought such shame on the Church have hardly ever involved pre-pubescent children, or indeed girls of any age. Rather, they are acts between men and teenage boys, which anti-Catholic media, academic and political types have been seeking for decades to make legally, socially and culturally acceptable, applying no social disapproval to those (such as Jonathan King) who engage in them, any more than, for example, to those who use cocaine. Such types' hypocrisy over the scandals in the Catholic Church has been, and remains, sickening.

Nor may one overlook the fact that these scandals have been presented in a manner agreeable to calls for the large-scale ordination of married men, for the "ordination" of women, and for the purported incorporation of homosexual genital activity into sacramental marriage. But married men sometimes abuse children. So do women, probably in vast numbers given their far easier access to children even in the nude; like, for example, domestic violence against men, those who control this field ideologically refuse to conduct the necessary research, because it does not fit their presupposed agenda of excluding (heterosexual) men from the socialisation of children. And the priests who had sex with teenage boys were not "repressed", but the very reverse.

Especially in America, the Priesthood has been packed with such unrepressed, so that their inevitable exposure could be used, in due season, to demand "reforms" which would not improve the situation at all. And such has now come to pass. It is inconceivable that the priestesses lobby, in particular, was not fully complicit in this, since for decades it has effectively controlled access to ordination in many American dioceses, while its influence is also still growing in Britain and elsewhere.

Given this enormous amount of medical malpractice, consumer fraud and other offences, class actions need to be filed against the Keepers of the Kinsey Flame: Johns Hopkins University, the Kinsey Institute at the University of Indiana, the San Francisco-based Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Sexuality, AASECT (American Association of Sex Educators, Counsellors and Therapists), SIECUS (Sex Information and Education Council of the United States) the SSS (Society for the Scientific Study of Sex), Planned Parenthood, the ever-generous Rockefeller Foundation, and numerous subordinates around the world. Just for starters. Those interested should contact Dr Judith Reisman, who describes her own perspective as "non-religious": jareisman@surewest.net.