Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Political prisoner, activist, journalist, hymn-writer, emerging thinktanker, aspiring novelist, "tribal elder", 2019 parliamentary candidate for North West Durham, Shadow Leader of the Opposition, "Speedboat", "The Cockroach", eagerly awaiting the second (or possibly third) attempt to murder me.
Do you read him or does he read you? The opening was yours, surely?
ReplyDeleteWe both read each other. (We are not just admirers of each other's work, we are even friends on Facebook.) And yes, the opening is lifted straight from me. A sign of something, with any luck...
ReplyDeleteThe opening may be yours, but it simply isn't true. A middle-class couple with both parents working will, in the vast majority of cases, be more than able to make ends meet. Unless they're spending their money really stupidly.
ReplyDeleteWell, you clearly have the David Cameron/Tony Blair/BBC definition of the middle class. A wildly inaccurate one.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous said.......
ReplyDelete"A middle-class couple with both parents working will, in the vast majority of cases, be more than able to make ends meet. Unless they're spending their money really stupidly."
Surely that was the whole point of the article? They may both be working but they don't get anytime to spend together or spend any quality time bringing their children up properly!
However, that being said I think there seems to be far more emphasis on families wanting "it all" in terms of material possessions. Watching these property programmes everyone seems to want playrooms for the children, en-suite bathrooms and all the rest then they complain that they have no money or are all too busy working to pay for it all.
And the television industry seems to have the same definition of the middle as Anonymous 9:33.
ReplyDeleteJust look at all that televised cooking, gardening, holidaying, and property acquisition and renovation by "ordinary" people. They have decidely extraordinary incomes, but television producers think that they are the norm.