Monday, 23 June 2008

Surveillance: Intrusive, Ineffective And Expensive

Says David Davis.
Posted by at

6 comments:

  1. Anonymous23 June 2008 at 19:17

    Therefore will the BPA candidate for the North East tell the voters on the region which of their CCTV cameras he proposes to take away?

    ReplyDelete
  2. David Lindsay24 June 2008 at 00:33

    There are two such candidates, and in any acse this isn't an EU matter.

    But everyone knows that CCTV cameras are a complete waste of money. Everyone outside the New Labour bunker, anyway. They don't even work half the time.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous24 June 2008 at 18:01

    alas then the era of spin will not be over with a BPA victory. A politician's answer if ever I heard one. He's asked a reasonable question for a party position and you have avoided it. As an MEP you would be an elected representative..therefore tell us which CCTV cameras in the North East would you remove and have the courage to list them in your election address

    ReplyDelete
  4. David Lindsay24 June 2008 at 18:09

    List them in my electiuon address? I know that most such things go in the bin anyway, but come on!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous24 June 2008 at 18:11

    David blogged on this last month:

    http://davidaslindsay.blogspot.com/2008/05/cctv.html

    In David's words, "Foot patrols? Did someone say foot patrols?"

    CCTV is a waste of time and money.

    ReplyDelete
  6. David Lindsay24 June 2008 at 18:12

    Exactly.

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)