You can't say that a Mayoral candidate might appeal to London's spendidly Old Labour black churches who held the following biologically, anthropologically and sociologically factual (as well as sheerly commonsensical) views:
- that engagement in, or a desire to engage in, homosexual acts is no basis for individual or collective economic, social, cultural or political identity, and in no sense comparable to sex, ethnicity or class;
- that, as it happens, black African culture only ever exhibits homosexual acts under heavy Arab and/or European influence, illustrating that these are cultural phenomena, for which not the slightest biological basis has ever been found to exist; and
- that the noisy, bullying, fabulously rich and well-connected, and wholly self-appointed and self-referential homosexualist lobby (which has a real problem with black people) should therefore be told exactly where to go by politicians who do not in any way wish to criminalise homosexual acts or to persecute those who engage in them.
You can deny the Holocaust. But you can't say that.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
One would think that you'd have given up on all this 'gay lobby\'gay international' tripe after your thorough bashing on CiF over the last few days. Its sad to see that your hang-up remains, and that you now seek to tag racism onto gay identity.
ReplyDeleteI won the argument hands down on Cif. I had facts, the rest of you just had "It must be! It must be! It must be! How dare you speak to us like that! Don't you know how rich ad powerful we are!" No change there, then.
ReplyDeleteThe racism thing in all of this is one to watch, of course. For example, if there were to be a Lambeth Conference next year, are black Britons supposed to stnad for the admission to this country of American and Canadian prelates who describe their own ostensible African brethren as "witch-doctors" and so forth?
I can feel David Duke-style Exclusion orders coming on. If not, why not?