Tuesday 26 July 2011

Tripoli Treachery?

Not a bit of it. So no Frog-bashing, please.

In la France éternelle, the land of Charles Martel, his heirs are valiantly engaged in a demographic war, not only against the rise of a semi-feral underclass which is in any case nothing on that in the “Anglo-Saxon” countries that have ceased to will the means to a properly functioning bourgeoisie and proletariat, but also against the Islamic expansionism that dismembered France as recently as 1962, when she was mutilated by the loss, not of three colonies, but of three départements, integral parts of the French state and nation. Calls for what would then have been a second, parallel Western Alliance, against Islamic expansion rather than against Communism, have been part of mainstream French politics ever since the 1950s.

That was the perspective from which, in and through the person of a decorated veteran of the Algerian War, France opposed the greatest catastrophe since 1962 for what was originally Christendom on three continents, covering every inch of the Mediterranean’s shores. For what remained of that, 1962 was the greatest catastrophe since 1948 (itself the greatest since 1923), and 2003 seems set to have been the greatest until a similar intervention in Syria. That will doubtless also be resisted, even if not by Sarkozy, then certainly by of la France éternelle, the conscious, literal rebirth of which will have tremendous consequences in, for example, the United Nations Security Council, where they can expect the support of Russia and will also deserve that of the United Kingdom and the United States.

3 comments:

  1. Campaign Group Convent Girl26 July 2011 at 18:30

    I'd valiantly engage in a demographic war with you against any and every threat.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Euston Jackson26 July 2011 at 18:44

    There is already no filter at all between the Islamic Far Right and the Hard Left, or between the Hard Left and the Centre Left.

    You and the descriptively style Campaign Group Convent Girl want there to be no filter between the Catholic and High Tory Far Rights and the Hard Left, or between the Hard Left and the Centre Left.

    When the antiwar cause unites Tankies, Trots, Islamists, and people who want to take the Tories back to their historic anti-Americanism and anti-Semitism, does it never occur to you, supposedly a traditional Labour right-winger, that you are on the wrong side with them?

    ReplyDelete
  3. No.

    Less of the "right-winger", please.

    Ah, that takes me back, the allegation that any opposition to the Euston Jackson war agenda is motivated by anti-Semitism. Like hearing something from that era on Radio Two.

    There is a beam in your own eye where "Tankies" and Trots are concerned. Not least in view of, though not restricted to, your Euston Jackson support for giving such undesirables the unfettered right to legislate for us in the Council of Ministers and the European Parliament.

    And as for Islamists, you have given or would give them Bosnia, Kosovo, Iraq, Chechnya and Xinjiang. You want them (Jundallah) and the Ba'athists (PMOI/MEK) to share Iran. And you are in the business of giving them Libya.

    ReplyDelete