Saturday, 15 March 2014

The Red Queen

Of course the Queen rightly observes that poverty is being ignored, and that more ought to be done in order to tackle it.

When Prince George was born, there were complaints that we now knew that our next three Heads of State, probably stretching into the next century, would all be white males. Well, they would all have been white males, anyway.

The present one is not male. But any elected Head of this State always would be. And white. And quite or very posh. So why bother changing the present arrangements?

No one with anything like the Royal Family’s foreign background would ever stand a hope of becoming the President of Britain. Nor would anyone aged 26, as the present Queen was when she came to the Throne. Nor would anyone aged 87, as she is now.

Liberty is the freedom to be virtuous, and to do anything not specifically proscribed.

Equality is the means to liberty, and is never to be confused with mechanical uniformity; it includes the Welfare State, workers’ rights, consumer protection, local government, a strong Parliament, public ownership, and many other things.

And fraternity is the means to equality, for example, in the form of trade unions, co-operatives, credit unions, mutual guarantee societies and mutual building societies, among numerous that could be cited.

Liberty, equality and fraternity are therefore inseparable from nationhood, a space in which to be unselfish. Thus from family, the nation in miniature, where unselfishness is first learned.

And thus from property, each family’s safeguard both against over-mighty commercial interests and against an over-mighty State, therefore requiring to be as widely diffused as possible, and thus the guarantor of liberty as here defined.

The family, private property and the State must be protected and promoted on the basis of their common origin and their interdependence, such that the diminution or withering away of any one or two of them can only be the diminution and withering away of all three of them. All three are embodied by monarchy.

Monarchy also embodies the principle of sheer good fortune, of Divine Providence conferring responsibilities upon the more fortunate towards the less fortunate.

It therefore provides an excellent basis for social democracy, as has proved the case in the United Kingdom, in the Old Commonwealth, in Scandinavia and in the Benelux countries.

Allegiance to a monarchy is allegiance to an institution embodied by a person, rather than to an ethnicity or an ideology as the basis of the State.

As Bernie Grant understood, and as one rather expects that Diane Abbott understands, allegiance to this particular monarchy, with its role in the Commonwealth, is a particular inoculation against racism.

No wonder that the National Party abolished it in South Africa. No wonder that the Rhodesian regime followed suit, and removed the Union Flag from that of Rhodesia, something that not even the Boers’ revenge republic ever did. No wonder that the BNP wants to abolish the monarchy here.

It was Margaret Thatcher who mounted an assault on the monarchy, since she scorned the Commonwealth, social cohesion, historical continuity, and public Christianity.

She called the Queen “the sort of person who votes for the SDP”, and she arrogated to herself the properly monarchical and royal role on the national and international stages. She used her most popular supporting newspaper to vilify the Royal Family.

When the Sex Pistols sang of a “Fascist regime” in the Britain of 1977, then they were referring to a Labour Cabinet with Tony Benn in it.

Their fans went on to elect Thatcher three times, and did not vote Labour at another General Election until Tony Blair had come along, giving him a third term as Prime Minister even two years after the invasion of Iraq.

God Save The Queen, Comrades. 

God Save The Queen.

2 comments:

  1. Funny you speak of Tony Benn here.

    His as the last Parliamentary attempt to abolish the monarchy (in 1992) and he nearly succeeded in his campaign of having the Queen's head removed from the stamp.

    Conservatve-supporting papers vilify the Queen?

    You mean the Mail and Telegraph?

    Are you joking?

    The only republican British newspapers-including the Morning Star, of course-are on the Left.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thatcher used The Sun and the News of the World to vilify the Royal Family. The Mail and Express titles joined in with gusto.

    The entire Murdoch stable hated the monarchy then and hates it now.

    The then-mighty Sunday Times was in that period edited by a staunch Thatcherite and staunch anti-monarchist, both of which he remains.

    Tony Benn tried his luck with that stamps business, but it was never going to happen. He probably thought that the Queen was a bit common. A lot of proper toffs genuinely do.

    ReplyDelete