When the President of the United States was a custard cream, then he was "above both the law and the Constitution" of his own country.
Meanwhile, his very word was both the law and the Constitution of this country, purely and simply because he had uttered it.
But the rules are different for chocolate hobnobs.
Illegally, we are banned from above the line on Telegraph Blogs, for a start. I can see absolutely no evidence to disprove that assertion, nor recall any in a good many years.
In fact, I am certain that I should not have been appointed if my background had been known. As soon as it was, then we all know what happened.
Moreover, material is routinely published there in order to incite expressions of racial hatred below the line.
Is it time to prosecute the editor of that racist hate site? If not, why not?
Meanwhile, his very word was both the law and the Constitution of this country, purely and simply because he had uttered it.
But the rules are different for chocolate hobnobs.
Illegally, we are banned from above the line on Telegraph Blogs, for a start. I can see absolutely no evidence to disprove that assertion, nor recall any in a good many years.
In fact, I am certain that I should not have been appointed if my background had been known. As soon as it was, then we all know what happened.
Moreover, material is routinely published there in order to incite expressions of racial hatred below the line.
Is it time to prosecute the editor of that racist hate site? If not, why not?
One of the most rascist articles I've ever read. Smacks of "Fried Chicken" jibe against Tiger Woods by Sergio Garcia. As you are more famous than both this surprises me.
ReplyDeleteYes, Thompson's is indeed one of the most racist articles, as such, that you will ever read.
ReplyDeleteBut when it comes to above-the-line baiting of those who always turn up below the line, that site is a league of its own.
Its editor really ought to be prosecuted. But he would enjoy prison too much.
He can either prove your point by appointing someone ethnic, and again when they are torn to shreds by the Tommy Robinsons below the line. Or prove your point by not appointing anyone ethnic. Either way you win. I don't always agree with you or even much like you. But you have always been a technical genius.
ReplyDeleteTactical. Sorry. Shouldn't do this at 2 in the morning.
ReplyDeleteDavid Lindsay, Lanchester's answer to Ali G.
ReplyDeleteBy all accounts, the Parish Council has taken full care of filling that position...
ReplyDeleteOn topic, please.