Although I have it on good authority that UKIP is going to make a serious play for that Tory European seat in Scotland, Harry Cole writes:
Tonight, the ‘cross-party’ Better Together
referendum campaign will have their London launch. At an event in the heart of
Westminster the begging bowl will go round, and a rallying call to protect the
union will go up. But who will be missing? Their heart might be set on a very
different referendum, but emails seen by Coffee House show that Ukip are being
officially excluded from campaigning to preserve the United Kingdom in 2014.
Correspondence between the Better Together campaign and Ukip Scotland reveals
that, despite protestations from the latter, the ‘board of directors’ at Better
Together are only officially interested in working with the ‘Scottish Labour
Party, Scottish Liberal Democrat Party and the Scottish Conservative &
Unionist Party.’
It’s not the first time that Ukip have been excluded from such an alliance. Back in 2011 Ukip were met with, at best, a quizzical eyebrow in liberal circles. At worst you could ruin a progressive dinner party just by dropping the Nigel ‘F bomb’. A decision by the ‘Yes to Fairer Votes’ in referendum campaign to exclude Ukip from their rainbow coalition of yellow, greens and reds was largely unreported. Ukip took it on the chin and supported the change to the Alternative Vote system for electing our MPs regardless.
It’s not the first time that Ukip have been excluded from such an alliance. Back in 2011 Ukip were met with, at best, a quizzical eyebrow in liberal circles. At worst you could ruin a progressive dinner party just by dropping the Nigel ‘F bomb’. A decision by the ‘Yes to Fairer Votes’ in referendum campaign to exclude Ukip from their rainbow coalition of yellow, greens and reds was largely unreported. Ukip took it on the chin and supported the change to the Alternative Vote system for electing our MPs regardless.
The less said about the rest of the spectacularly
incompetent campaign the better, but the final results were not pretty. Yes2AV,
as they became known, allowed themselves to be painted as wishy-washy
metropolitan liberal elites, happy to waste vast sums of money on a small issue
that mattered little to anyone, anywhere. Ukip would have been able to balance
that accusation out, yet minds had already been made up.
Fast forward two years, about 15 percentage
points in the latest polls, and Ukip are impossible to ignore. Some are clearly
still trying though. No one can really deny that the Better Together campaign –
the official referendum group fighting for the United Kingdom – is heavily
dominated by Scottish Labour, and Ukip sources point to this as the main
sticking point.
For obvious reasons, David Cameron has thus far kept a pretty
low profile north of the border, and the political rehabilitation of Alistair
Darling, who is spearheading the campaign, is gathering pace. While Scottish
Labour figures may be the public face of Better Together, and key players in
the organisation have strong connections to the party, much of the money – and
many of the footsoldiers – will be coming from the Tories and the Liberals.
Begging bowls are being passed around London and recruitment drives are in full
swing. The more the merrier, seems to be the official logic, except when it
comes to Ukip.
A source from Better Together says ‘support from
individuals is one thing, but the aim of the game is to make it majority
non-party campaign.’ A nice goal, but one that seems somewhat idealistic given
the low levels of public interest in the matter and the might of the SNP
machine, backed by executive power. ‘The only way we can knock on all the doors
is to get all these normal people who clearly support us to do stuff.’
Again a
nice idea, yet one that did not work for the equally lofty Yes2AV. Campaigners
for the union may well feel vindicated by Nigel Farage’s less-than-successful
visit to Edinburgh last month, but if they really do want all hands on deck, it
does seem extraordinary to reject explicit overtures for support. And it does
give new irony to the campaign group’s name.
No comments:
Post a Comment