After all, it shouldn't.
Partly, it matters because of the media
concentration on the SWP in their treatment of opposition to the Iraq War and thus
to the wider neoconservative war agenda, an opposition which embraced and embraces 90 per
cent of the British population. Such are the media's backgrounds that the SWP
was and is the only part that they could even begin to understand.
That suited the SWP down to the ground.
Meanwhile, the mainstream opposition to that war and to those wider war agenda
has been as ignored as the left-wing opposition to the EU, or the work of trade
unions in promoting high-employment energy independence, or the entire
tradition of rural Radicalism, to cite only three of the most obvious examples.
Bringing us to the main reason, which is the very
British lack of anything to anchor the Left while engaging fully in the battle
of ideas at every level of cultural life and of the education system; while
refusing to consign or to confine demotic culture to "the enormous
condescension of posterity"; while co-ordinating broad-based and inclusive
campaigns for human rights and civil liberties, for peace (including nuclear,
radiological, chemical and biological disarmament, and including against the
arms trade), for environmental responsibility, and for the defence and
extension of jobs, services and amenities; and while acting as a friendly
critic and a critical friend of, in British terms, the Labour Party.
At best, and just imagine what the worst must be
if you do not already know, we have to make do with the SWP,
"Workers" who have never so much as ironed a shirt or changed a light
bulb in their lives.
writer David Lindsay has also called for the refounding of the Independent Labour Party
ReplyDeleteNeil Clark, Morning Star, 07 October 2012.
"....the SWP, "Workers" who have never so much as ironed a shirt or changed a light bulb in their lives."
ReplyDeleteAgreed.