The brilliant Peter Oborne writes:
It is more than 50 years since President
Eisenhower destroyed a British prime minister, Anthony Eden, when he pulled the
plug on the Anglo-French invasion of Suez in 1956. It may turn out that a few
carefully chosen words in an on-the-record briefing in London on Wednesday from
US assistant secretary Philip Gordon have an equally dramatic effect.
One thing is certain. Mr Gordon has
contemptuously smashed the foundation myth of the modern Tory party: namely,
that somehow, out there, exists an “anglosphere”, a zone of common values that
unites the English-speaking peoples, and in particular the US and Britain. For
decades, Right-wing Republicans have beguiled credulous Conservatives into
speculation that they were free to choose between America and Europe. Mr Gordon
spelt out the uncomfortable truth that such an option does not exist, that
British exit from the European Union would be unacceptable to the US – and
that, so far as President Obama is concerned, Britain only matters as part of
the EU.
It is important to grasp that Obama is doing no
more than returning to the policy being pursued by the first George Bush. To
Britain’s intense resentment, Bush used his 1988 presidential victory to
reshape the United States’s engagement with Europe away from London and towards
Bonn – and, after the fall of communism, Berlin.
This shift stalled after the first Gulf War, when
many European countries pleaded neutrality while Britain threw its full support
behind the US. The Bush strategy then collapsed entirely when Germany refused
to get involved in the invasion of Iraq. For a brief period, Tony Blair’s
Britain and George W Bush’s US joined forces as world policemen. It genuinely
seemed that the anglosphere had assumed some kind of reality.
But we now have a new set of political leaders,
and radically changed circumstances. The US is turning its face towards the
Pacific while Britain counts for less. Indeed, I understand that the informal
chatter of American diplomats that has followed Philip Gordon’s remarks is yet
more devastating: Britain is a middle-ranking economy and declining military
force which risks irrelevance outside the EU. We are low down the batting
order, ranking behind not just China, Brazil, India and Russia but also – most
painfully of all – well below Germany in international significance.
So it is worth spelling out the choice that the
Obama administration believes we face: play a full part in Europe or face
international isolation and irrelevance. More humiliating still, the US
probably does not care all that much which choice wemake.
It is impossible to overstate how shattering this
message is to Tory Eurosceptics. For two decades, Michael Howard, Liam Fox,
Michael Gove, Iain Duncan Smith and others have cherished the US link as an
alternative to Europe. Now they are being told that if they want to sustain
their American friendship they must enter fully into the heart of Europe.
Hence last week’s screams of pain. Thatcherite
Eurosceptics, who applauded every action of the Bush administration as it
bloodily tried to rearrange the Islamic world, are now telling the US to mind
its own business. This is shambolic. The Tory Right, if it wants to retain an
ounce of intellectual credibility, has to start again. It needs to explain what
Britain would be like outside the EU, who our trading partners and key allies
would be, and why we would not be perilously isolated.
Left-wing Eurosceptics such as Tony Benn face no
such intellectual problem. They have consistently warned that the EU was a
capitalist block whose real purpose was to act as proxy for US capitalism
around the globe. Indeed, Philip Gordon in his briefing made it plain that he
understood the EU role in terms that Benn would instantly recognise: “We
benefit when the EU is unified, speaking with a single voice, and focused on
our shared interests around the world and in Europe.”
But the Tory Right’s long fantasy has ended.
Their precious alliance with America now means an alliance with Europe, too.
Their alternative – embattled isolation – is honourable but will carry little
traction with the electorate. Only another crisis will rescue them; their best
strategy is to keep quiet and hope for the worst. The eurozone crisis is not
yet over, and if the single currency shatters, all bets are off.
Mr Lindsay:
ReplyDeleteGreetings, again. I just would like to ask what you would advice to any country or government that plans to establish a public broadcasting service, specifically a Southeast Asian country. You may not be able to give full advice on this, but at least I would like to hear your opinions on this matter.
Thanks.
Idrian
Public service broadcasters are a good thing in principle. Every country really ought to have one.
ReplyDeleteBut on topic, please.