Not at all. It backed the Lib Dems last time. And the time before that, which was before the invasion of Iraq. But no one noticed.
2
comments:
Anonymous
said...
I remember discussing this with you back in 2001. I am as baffled as you are, there's a good David Lindsay word, that everyone seems to think this is news. Historically Liberal paper backs Lib Dems for third time running, how is that news?
The pro-life, pro-family, pro-worker and anti-war voice of an economically social democratic, morally and socially conservative patriotism towards the North of England, the United Kingdom, the Commonwealth and Christendom. One Nation politics, with an equal emphasis on the One and on the Nation. Conservationist, not environmentalist. Far too conservative to be capitalist, far too left-wing to be liberal.
2 comments:
I remember discussing this with you back in 2001. I am as baffled as you are, there's a good David Lindsay word, that everyone seems to think this is news. Historically Liberal paper backs Lib Dems for third time running, how is that news?
I suppose it is in a context in which anything to do with the Lib Dems is worth reporting.
Post a Comment