Saturday 1 November 2008

Draw The Line: Vote Yes To Florida's Amendment Two

Right Democrat again, of course:

Florida Red & Blue continues to distort the facts in their campaign against the Marriage Protection Amendment 2. The latest TV commercial from the group falsely claims that unmarried couples will be denied hospital visitation rights if Amendment 2 is approved.

First of all, Amendment 2 will not impact local domestic partnership laws. All state constitutional amendments are carefully reviewed by the Florida Supreme Court before being placed on the ballot to assure that the proposal addresses a single subject. Amendment 2 deals solely with the definition of marriage as one man and one woman.

Secondly, most Floridians do not live a city or county where domestic partner registration is available but there is a state law which allows anyone to designate a health care surrogate. Take a look at Florida Statutes 765.202 and it will be clear that the heart-wrenching stories told to us by Florida Red & Blue are pure fiction.

Saint Leo University's student newspaper The Lion's Pride makes a strong case for Amendment 2.

Vote "yes" on Amendment 2

October 24, 2008

BY JOSHUA M. SMITH

Lions’ Pride Online Editor

Marriage is the union of one man and one woman. That is what the word “marriage” means. It’s a shame, but, due to the Gay Rights lobby, Floridians now find it necessary to write that definition into law.

Amendment 2, which will appear on the November 4 ballots in Florida, states, “In as much as a marriage is the legal union of only one man and one woman as husband and wife, no other legal union that is treated as marriage or the substantial equivalent thereof shall be valid or recognized.”

This amendment is not anti-gay. It does not make gays second-class citizens. It merely upholds Florida’s right to define marriage for itself.

Without Amendment 2, Florida finds itself in a position to have to arbitrarily decide whether gay marriage agreements from other states such as Massachusetts and California should be honored by Florida gays who travel to those states and get married under those states’ laws.

Whether one feels that gays should be allowed to marry or not, this issue should not be decided for Florida by the legislature or courts of another state. State sovereignty must be upheld, because allowing one state to set policy and law for another state sets a dangerous precedent for the entire nation.

That is why all Floridians—gay or straight—should vote “yes” on Amendment 2.

A vote of “no” does nothing to advance the cause of gay rights and gay marriage. Under current law, gays are allowed to enter into any legal agreement they wish. Gay couples live together, raise children together, visit each other in the hospital, and receive domestic partner health benefits already without being “married.”

If gay couples already enjoy the same perceived benefits as married couples, what then is the point of working to allow gays to be married?

After following the issue for several years, I have found no satisfactory and reasonable answer to that question. Gays’ desire for the right to marry is often nothing more than a coercive attempt to force society to accept their behavior.

If gays want to live the way they live, why must a heterosexual agree with that lifestyle? Why must a heterosexual society condone and endorse that lifestyle through its laws?

The answer too often is “so gays can feel better about themselves,” which is unfortunate, since gays ought to be deciding the value of their lifestyle on their own terms rather than looking to society to justify it for them.

If gays want to be gay, fine. But, gays shouldn’t expect others to agree with their lifestyle. I like owning a gun, but I do not feel the need to require other people to like the idea of me owning a gun. So long as no one tries to pass a law telling me I do not have the right to own a gun, I am satisfied.

Likewise, gays ought to find satisfaction in the equality they enjoy in America. Gays can do everything heterosexuals can in terms of what really matters: partnership, parenthood, and equal treatment under the law. Anything they choose to agitate for beyond that equality equates to special treatment, which actuality works against their interests by setting them further apart from others.

Florida’s Amendment 2 is a defense of state sovereignty. It is not an attempt to curtail anyone’s rights. As such, every Floridian has a duty to vote “yes” on Amendment 2 in order to stop other states from being able to tell Florida what to do.

If California is allowed to tell Florida what to do on the gay marriage issue, just imagine what other states such as Texas might then be able to tell Florida what to do on issues such as oil drilling. We as Floridians must act now to stop such intrusion into our laws by other states. A vote of “yes” on Amendment 2 is an important first step to that end.

3 comments:

  1. If gays want to be gay, fine. But, gays shouldn’t expect others to agree with their lifestyle. I like owning a gun, but I do not feel the need to require other people to like the idea of me owning a gun. So long as no one tries to pass a law telling me I do not have the right to own a gun, I am satisfied.


    Is "owning a gun" in-built or hardwired into the brain?

    ReplyDelete
  2. No. And neither is homosexuality.

    Because if homosexuality was hardwired into the brain, then that would make homosexuality a neurological disorder, one which scientists could then seek to cure.

    Rather, homosexuality's only hope for legitimacy rests in its status as a lifestyle choice, one that, despite its perversity, ought to be tolerated by a free society.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ok, I wish straight people would listen to gay people and stop making unfounded assumptions. Being gay is not a choice. I am gay, and I was born like this. I have no choice but to be like this, so therefore to be happy with who I am I have to accept being gay, which I have and am very happy. Why is it anyone else's business (particularly people I don't even know) to dictate to me who I can love, how does it even affect you? I don't understand why people spend so much of their time campaigning for something that has no effect on their lives, but reduces the rights of their fellow human beings... Seems slightly un-Christian to treat people this way... Just a thought!

    ReplyDelete