Wednesday, 3 September 2008

Wholly Separate

Whether or not Sarah Palin has ever been in the Alaskan Independence Party, the serious suggestion that she might have been illustrates how fallacious it is to suppose that separatism is a left-wing movement at least in some ancestrally Marxist sense, or even at all. It certainly isn't in Alaska. Nor is it in the American South. Nor is it in parts of the American West, where it does sometimes turn up.

Nor is it Scotland. Nor is it, really, in Wales, where Leftist rhetoric is employed to no lasting electoral effect whatever in the English-speaking South, but where the real Plaid Cymru heartland is still among Welsh-speaking farmers who are really Tories or old-style Liberals, but who are particularly concerned about the language. Nor is it in Ireland, where Marxism is confined to the core of Sinn Féin, and is certainly not much shared among its wider voters, whose economic interests, whether or not they like to admit it, would be extremely ill-served by Northern Ireland's incorporation into the Irish Republic, where "labour must wait" as much now as when James Connolly first told it so. Nor is it among the sorts of Englishmen who have adopted separatist bombast in recent years.

Nor is it Flanders, although there it might yet turn out to be just too paleocon to go through with dissolving a Catholic monarchy. Nor is it in Spain: Carlism is difficult to place in left-right terms, but the "Fueros" in "Dios, Patria, Fueros, Rey" certainly underlies, at least in part, the separatism in Galicia (land of the old Falangist, Manuel Fraga and his Partido Popular Galego), in the Basque Country (where there is opposition to the Mass in Spanish instead of in Latin, because it is Spanish rather than in Basque), and in Catalonia, where the separatists also look to the staunchly Catholic nineteenth-century tradition of Gaudí, the tradition of resistance to capitalism not least because capitalism is inseparable from decadent social libertinism and from cultural philistinism.

It should, however be emphasised that there is nothing Catholic (certain transient appearances notwithstanding) about the Romantic reaction against rationalism and its Revolution, any more than about those things themselves. Nor is there anything Catholic about wishing to dismember a Catholic Kingdom, in Spain any more than in Belgium.

So, is there anywhere where separatism really is a movement of the Left?

4 comments:

  1. The true Marxist will support any cause that furthers the interests of the Revolution by undermining lawful authority. Even today there are plenty of American "conservatives" who support the American Revolution. Remember, the likes of Sarah Palin (not to mention Pat Buchanan) are only "conservatives" by American standards. For a lot of these people "conservatism" means "freedom" - which sadly is a view shared on the loopier fringes of the modern Tory Party.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The American Revolution predates Marxism. Marxists are rarely, if ever, too keen on the American Republic.

    Nor, which is my point, are they too prominent, to say the least, among supporters of secession Alaska, the American South, the American West, Scotland (they make a lot of noise, but there are not many of them among SNP members, never mind voters), Wales (ditto), Ireland (ditto), England (where they don't even make much noise, although do see Chrlie Marks's blog), Flanders, Galicia, the Basque Country, or Catalonia.

    Nor are the supporters of independence in Abkhazia or South Ossetia Marxists. Very far from it, in fact.

    As for Buchanan and Palin, I'm not so sure. Palin, yes, or at lesat probably: not a bookworm, and an Evangelical rather than a Catholic. But I think that Buchanan really is open to the Biblico-Patristic critique of Americanism.

    ReplyDelete
  3. More fascist rantings!

    The Terboven of the Welsh indeed!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Good old BDJ. He sees a word he doesn't understand, or the name of a person of whom he has never heard, and his effing starts off again. Which means that it does so rather a lot.

    At least he can now spell it correctly. He always used to write "facist" or "facism". Not just once, but several times per day over a period of months.

    Why does he come here? Is it just some Max Mosley-style public school masochism?

    ReplyDelete