Wednesday, 10 September 2008

The British People's Alliance Website

Here.
Posted by at

8 comments:

  1. Anonymous10 September 2008 at 19:17

    A few supportive comments:

    1. Could you not have paid a website developer so make it look a bit more glitzy? Students etc needn't cost very much. It hardly shrieks out professionalism

    2. Why do you not have additional news etc things to announce? Blank pages equally send out an unprofessional message

    3. Make more of the exclusive news that you are the PPC for Durham!

    4. Have you publicised this to media outlets? It would e interesting to see the coverage you get, perhaps in the Echo?

    Bravo, and good luck!

    Onja

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous10 September 2008 at 20:54

    Let the social and moral conservatives of the British People's Alliance restore attempted suicide as a criminal offence, as it was until 1961. Sadly, I do not see this on the website.

    I am also concerned about your advocacy of second amendment rights (i.e., the right to bear arms). Not only does this seem to cut across the British tradition, although I recall Peter Hitchens once attempted to argue otherwise, but I cannot conceive of it having the authority of Jesus Christ, who I love in order for the love of God to be reciprocated.

    However, given that the forces of darkness are likely to be stronger in this world, I am concerned that the BPA would give very many people the opportunity to shoot themselves as a way of ending their lives. Without God’s authority too! This would only make the British People's Alliance look ridiculous.

    A majority for the BPA though, is surely a certainty in the next general election, and I intend to vote for you.

    May God guide you,
    Anon

    ReplyDelete
  3. David Lindsay11 September 2008 at 15:20

    "Why do you not have additional news etc things to announce?"

    Because the thing only went up this week. And it's really about policy, anyway.

    "Make more of the exclusive news that you are the PPC for Durham!"

    North-West Durham, not the City.

    Back end of next week for the local press, with any luck.

    "Not only does this seem to cut across the British tradition"

    It's in the paragraph about America. And anyway, it doesn't. Until after the First World War, when there was serious hope or fear of a revolution, there was very little restriction on firearms ownership in Britain. I'm not advocating a return to that, but it is the case.

    Britain is completely gun-sodden regardless of the law. And as for America, guns are nothing new there, whereas the collapse of family and community structures (resulting from the collapse of trade and immigration restrictions) is, as is the drugging up of teenagers with anti-depressents and such like.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous11 September 2008 at 17:27

    You can win NW Durham you know.

    Reading the page for pro-worker social democrats, there isn't a Labour Councillor here who wouldn't agree with it. Most of the Independent ones would too.

    Reading the page for conservative patriots, there isn't an Independent Councillor here who wouldn't agree with it. Most of the Labour ones would too.

    And this seat contains any number of Catholics and others who would sign up to the pro-life and pro-family page. A lot of them are Councillors.

    That's a hell of a lot of local organisers.

    Go for it. You can take this one.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous11 September 2008 at 17:54

    Certainly your platform proved highly popular last time you stood for the council.

    ReplyDelete
  6. David Lindsay11 September 2008 at 18:12

    An election address gleaned word for word from my letters to the Advertiser took a deposit-saving ten per cent of the vote in 2005.

    And that was before large numbers of Labour Councillors had simply let their membership lapse, as they are openly planning to do once Derwentside District Council is abolished.

    Standing for the District was a device to save my Parish seat. But you Westminster Village People wouldn't understand that. I might as well talk about delivering leaflets or something.

    The Independent candidate last time is unlikely to stand again. The Lib Dems won't really fight this seat. The Tories won't fight it at all. And New Labour will put up some parachuted in Millbank clone, probably off an all-women shortlist.

    New Labour absolutely will not consider local candidates where the North East is concerned; no other part of the country is treated like that. And of course you have to be London-based to get onto an all-women shortlist. That's what they are for.

    Any local candidate who cannot beat some parachuted in Millbank clone, probably off an all-women shortlist, is simpy not making an effort. And I certainly will be making an effort.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous11 September 2008 at 18:18

    Break Dancing Jesus nearly lost his seat. You got far more votes than he did. But he had spent four years going round saying that you were going to lose your seat, even while you were still a Labour member.

    Anonymous 17:27 is probably already on an all-women shortlist. She's enough of a dolly bird, clearly.

    ReplyDelete
  8. David Lindsay11 September 2008 at 18:29

    No, Anonymous 17:27 is locally based, and so ineligible for an all-women shortlist such as will be used to pick the next New Labour candidate for this seat.

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)