I have been repeatedly turned down for Personal Independence Payment, even on appeal, despite having osteoarthritis from head to toe, the remains of the most ulcerated colon of anyone who ever lived to tell the tale, depression, anxiety, obsessive compulsive disorder, paranoid personality disorder, anankastic personality disorder, anxious personality disorder, and an Autism Spectrum Disorder, possibly Asperger's Syndrome. So I can assure you that PIP is hard to get. Anyone who is receiving it must really, really, really need it.
Those who suggest that it is possible to self-certify as mentally, or if some of them were to be believed even physically, ill enough to be awarded PIP, yet for some unknown reason most people, including themselves, did not therefore do so, are on the same level as those who suggest that anyone might use a foodbank, yet for some unknown reason most people, including themselves, did not therefore do so.
In the spirit of 40 years of Education Secretaries who have presumed to opine as to how much homework should be set, how often disruptive pupils should be put out of class, and so on, Wes Streeting, whose only degree is in History and who has never worked outside politics, now informs us that there is an "overdiagnosis" of mental illness. It is particularly galling to hear the approval of people who opposed the lockdowns, and who have rarely stopped banging on about them in the five years since. They predicted an explosion in mental illness, and that is undeniably a factor. But the alternative was mass deaths from Covid-19. The lockdowns were the less bad option. Yet those who most noisily foresaw its downside seem not to have noticed their vindication.
Streeting is personally opposed to assisted suicide, although it would be interesting to see whether he would resign rather than implement it. But his attitude is the context in which it is being railroaded through Parliament, with even the requirement of approval by a High Court judge having been abandoned, meaning that the Bill itself ought to be, in the terms in which it was given a Second Reading. Streeting's enthusiasm for contracting out the National Health Service to his own private donors is the context in which assisted suicide is openly expected to be treated in the same way, no doubt with prepayment plans, with advertising, and with sales staff paid by footfall. The withdrawal of benefits from the already suicidal ought to do those interests no end of good. And with them, their pet politicians.
Yet Streeting is right to take back control of the NHS in England by abolishing NHS England. The complaints about job losses are never made by or on behalf of more useful workers. Streeting has empowered his successors, and it is now our task to supply them.
“those who suggest that anyone might use a foodbank“
ReplyDeleteThat is perfectly true. My father volunteered in one, and they do not require anyone who comes to prove they are in poverty or need free food.
Then we would all be doing it. Don't be silly.
DeleteYou are so back.
ReplyDeleteI so am.
Delete
ReplyDelete“Then we would all be doing it.”
No we wouldn’t-some of us have basic decency. But a system that hands out free food without needing any proof that the recipient actually needs it is wide open to abuse, and it certainly gets abused.
Try it and let us know how you get on. We will be needing proof of this one.
DeleteTry and tell me exactly what checks food banks carry out on those who attend them (the rest of us all know the answer). Of course you can’t, because you know the whole system’s a racket and a propaganda effort. Hilariously the number of people claiming free food without checks is used aa evidence of poverty-when of course it’s just evidence of more food banks.
ReplyDeleteIf Apple see up stalls in every town heading out free iPhones with no checks, funnily enough a lot of people would claim them too. It wouldn’t mean the country was too poor to afford a phone.
I look forward to the video of your using a foodbank in that way.
DeleteA Mail On Sunday journalist famously did exactly that and filmed himself getting free food with no ID checks whatsoever (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2608606/No-ID-no-checks-vouchers-sob-stories-The-truth-shock-food-bank-claims.html ) were you in a coma for the last ten years ?
ReplyDeleteBut most of the people stealing free food of course don’t tend to post videos of it. You clown.
Gosh, what passes for fame in your world. Hey ho, let's see your own proof, then.
DeleteAnyone, even Mail on Sunday reporters, can get free food from a food bank. He filmed himself doing so.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2608606/No-ID-no-checks-vouchers-sob-stories-The-truth-shock-food-bank-claims.html
Course he did.
Delete“I look forward to the video of your using a foodbank in that way.“
ReplyDeleteAlready been done by the Mail on Sunday (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2608606/No-ID-no-checks-vouchers-sob-stories-The-truth-shock-food-bank-claims.html). Any informed reader can tell you don’t know what you’re talking about: you plainly never knew that food banks don’t even require ID….
Oh, well, in that case it must be true.
DeleteIndeed it’s true. It’s on video if you bothered to click the link above-and the newspaper was never sued for a perfectly accurate story.
ReplyDeleteOf course you still haven’t answered my question: what checks do food banks conduct on those who visit them and what documentation do they require? We can all see why you haven’t answered the question.
They don’t even require ID.
You have to be referred to a foodbank.
DeleteThe poor can't sue.
You don’t have to be referred to independent food banks (like those run by churches) and even the Trussel Trust ones still hand out emergency food without a voucher.
ReplyDeleteBut of course it doesn’t matter since none of them ask for ID…
It never takes long before you people come out in favour of things like identity cards.
Delete