Sunday 11 August 2024

Streets Ahead

British arms have killed more than 90 already displaced people at prayer in al-Taba'een school, but the Government's resumption of the funding of UNRWA, its withdrawal of its objections to the International Criminal Court's arrest warrants, and its hints at the restriction of arms sales and at the recognition of Palestine, were all consequences of the re-election of Jeremy Corbyn, of the election of four more Left Independents, of the defeat of Jonathan Ashworth and Thangam Debbonaire, of the halving of Keir Starmer's constituency vote, and of the near-defeat of Wes Streeting, Shabana Mahmood and Jess Phillips. All of those went back in turn to the Gaza ceasefire marches, which had already brought down Suella Braverman. There had not been such a successful movement from the streets in Britain since the Poll Tax and its Prime Minister were swept away.

And on Wednesday evening, the same movement, complete with the same flag, and again organised by the people who had been driven out of the Labour Party and by their allies, earned the praise of the Police by frightening off the streets the people who, having rioted at the Cenotaph on Armistice Day and injured nine Police Officers, had been rioting for a week until they were told to expect opposition. Faced with that, they ran away and hid.

The rioters were clearly not afraid of the Police, having spent successive days and nights throwing concrete slabs at them, burning their vehicles, and so on. Nor were they deterred by derisory sentences. The Just Stop Oil irritants deserved to go to prison, but these racially aggravated attempted murderers obviously deserved to do so for longer; if the four Green MPs made the complaints that anyone might make about undue leniency, then they would have a point. No, it was when the Left and the unions brought the People to the streets that the streets were reclaimed. They are ours now.

Those who would flatter themselves that they were the counterparts of Continental Cagoules need to be made to explain to those supposed equals why they had decided to watch the counterdemonstrations on television. Meanwhile, the Labour Party had banned its MPs from attending, not that almost any of them would have wished to have done so, because the Government had expected 100 riots, leading to an assault on civil liberties such as had characterised all parties in office in the last 30 years. A classic example lies behind the controversy around the deduction of bed and board costs from the compensation of the wrongfully imprisoned. Even the Liberal Democrats were in the Cabinet when the law was changed so that those applying to be so compensated, and whose appeals had been upheld, would henceforth be required to prove their innocence beyond reasonable doubt, and to do so to a committee of state functionaries. Note that at least in my case, the judge specifically instructed the jury to "disregard the concept" of guilt beyond reasonable doubt. I have explicitly never been convicted beyond reasonable doubt.

In providing the excuse for the latest set of such measures, anyone who looked more like a Palestinian than Keir Starmer did would have been collateral damage. Let their hostels burn. As for dead coppers, they would have been grist to the mill. But this time, it was not to be. For having commended the "show of unity from communities" that took back control, Sir Mark Rowley has attracted the ire of Nick Thomas-Symonds, who is a Minister only because Ashworth lost his seat, and who is a Starmer tribute act, another of those suburban headmasters who think that they are Robocop. Unless I am very much mistaken, while he oversaw the paperwork for a few years, Starmer has never appeared at the Bar to prosecute a criminal case. I have met a lot more sometime criminal defendants than the average layman has, and every one of them, including me, would have laughed in his face. As everyone still should, and never more so than now. Whose streets? Our streets.

10 comments:

  1. Peter Hitchens calls it right in his MOS column.

    “The shrivelling of the supposed riots had nothing to do with pious assemblies of pro-migration demonstrators idiotically clutching identical placards run off by the Socialist Worker printshop.

    What made the difference was a real fear of being caught and fear of retribution, among the tiny criminal minority who normally get a free run in this country.We can all be grateful to the police for doing what we actually pay them for, for once. Alas, Sir Keir Starmer and his Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper, will never draw the right lessons from this. They are a clueless mixture. They like authoritarian rule over the law-abiding, but they won’t protect the public against thieves, vandals and drunken or drugged louts.”

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Utter nonsense, and the exact opposite of what the Police themselves say. As his stance on the General Election indicated, Hitchens is just desperate not to be pensioned off. He is complaining that no one will publish his next book. Well, the mighty Mail does not employ people like that.

      Delete
  2. I loved Hitchens description of the anti fascist types as “pious assemblies of pro-migration demonstrators idiotically clutching identical placards run off by the Socialist Worker printshop.”

    As he rightly says none of the anti migration protestors were scared of a bunch of snowflakes with identical placards, and all that this shows is that policing and swift punishment actually deters crime; yet our useless leftwing police never applies that principle to actual crime, only to “right wing” protestors.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, of course it was organised by the SWP and those less squeamish again. Everyone knew that. That was why the Police welcomed it, and that was why the other side stayed away. Those less squeamish again, at least, do not play nice when they do not have to. And like the Police, the fash know it.

      Delete
  3. You're right, the SWP were the least of it, I saw all the usual suspects and no doubt so did you. If the other lot had turned up there'd literally have been blood on the streets. The police know all that and they've said they were delighted.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Inspired, indeed.

      Oh, yes, they were all there. There are some things that Peelers cannot do, but which have to be done against the fash. That is what the Left is for, and the Police know it. As do the fash, who therefore ran away and hid when the Police told the Left where the fash's 100 meeting points were going to be. I love it when a plan comes together.

      Delete
  4. Tears of laughter at the thought anyone thought that protesters, many of whom were hardened footie hooligans, were scared of a pathetic parade of Guardian readers with pink and yellow signs (and often pink hair).

    It was of course the massive police presence, arrest of many hundreds and swift sentencing that proved a deterrent. The “other side” was the most pathetic display I’ve seen in a while; nothing could be less “rebellious” than organising a parade in support of mass immigration. I’m surprised Tony Blair wasn’t leading it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You do not have a clue. Not a clue. But the Police do. If from bitter, though mostly fairly long ago, experience, they know whom to call, and how, when things need to be done that they have never been allowed to do. The fash also understand that, which was why they ran away and hid. Thus did the Police spare themselves from being given powers that they did not want, but which the likes of Starmer had wanted to give them before trying to bully them into using them. But not this time. It has all worked out beautifully.

      Delete
    2. The huge march in Newcastle, maybe the biggest in the country, had everyone on it the Brown Trousers wouldn't want to meet in a dark alley and no doubt the same was true everywhere. We haven't always got on with the cops but they've played a blinder this time, telling us where the knuckle-draggers would be so they knew we'd be there to greet them the way we always did. Made them cry behind the sofa watching us on telly, British fascism is a shadow of its former self. You were missed in Newcastle.

      Delete
    3. That is very kind of you, but I am not going to be well enough for that sort of thing for a very long time, if ever again. I am of course still around in other capacities, though. And everything else that you say is spot on.

      Delete