Only a Conservative MP, a Conservative Peer, and the decidedly non-Starmerite Michael Mansfield KC, who I am told has left the Labour Party, have called for a public inquiry into the case of Andrew Malkinson. From the former Director of Public Prosecutions who is now the Leader of the Opposition, and from his party, there is silence.
In wishing Mr Malkinson every success, consider that you would never be prosecuted for anything that had in the meantime ceased to be a criminal offence. Under the Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Act, nothing that was done to him would be illegal now. Labour abstained on that Bill, and it would not repeal that Act, just as it would not repeal the Overseas Operations (Service Personnel and Veterans) Act that it also did not oppose.
But when I tell you that there is going to be a hung Parliament, then you can take that to the bank. I spent the 2005 Parliament saying that it was psephologically impossible for the Heir to Blair's Conservative Party to win an overall majority. I predicted a hung Parliament on the day that the 2017 General Election was called, and I stuck to that, entirely alone, all the way up to the publication of the exit poll eight long weeks later. And on the day that Rishi Sunak became Prime Minister, I predicted that a General Election between him and Keir Starmer would result in a hung Parliament.
To strengthen families and communities by securing economic equality and international peace through the democratic political control of the means to those ends, including national and parliamentary sovereignty, we need to hold the balance of power. Owing nothing to either main party, we must be open to the better offer. There does, however, need to be a better offer. Not a lesser evil, which in any case the Labour Party is not.
Of course Parliament all voted for the Overseas Operations (Service Personnel and Veterans) Act since they all voted for the Good Friday Surrender that made that act necessary. The act was drafted to correct the appalling and indefensible double standard emerging from that surrender by which elderly British veterans were pursued in their care homes for 'historic offences' while they were operating in the service of the Queen, while convicted IRA terrorists were released onto the streets while the unconvinced were sent 'comfort letters.'
ReplyDeleteIf Parliament supported that disgrace, then the least it could do is ensure the same applies to our own soldiers.
I realise that that is your hobbyhorse, although it is no one's in the place that is affected by it. But this Act is not really about that at all. It makes these things legal in the present and in the future. As with the Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Act, that is its purpose and that is its effect. It is not about the past.
DeleteI don’t know what planet you’re on but this was the major issue at the time that kicked off the introduction of the Bill (which relates to prosecutions for historic offences). This act was specifically introduced after ex soldier Johnny Mercer resigned from the government over what he called the “second-class treatment” British veterans from Northern Ireland exposed to endless litigation from Republican-linked human rights lawyers while IRA killers walked free.
ReplyDeleteOh, that was just a hook. Mercer is so thick that I sometimes think that he is an actor playing a caricature of a minor public school, ex-Army Tory. A younger Harry Enfield would have done it better. And even if Mercer is real, then no one in the place affected agrees with him. The main focus of this Act is future wars.
DeleteMercer is one of the few people in Parliament with any experience of real life (and real wars) unlike people such as, say, Jeremy Corbyn who never worked outside politics.
ReplyDeleteIt would be right to end prosecutions of British veterans of the Troubles specifically but I agree there’s no need to extend this to all wars, and Johnny Mercer agreed with that in his criticism of this Act.
Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah.
DeleteThe media are covering Starmer's back on this.
ReplyDeleteYes. All of them.
Delete“no one in the place affected agrees with him.” Is that why polls show most unionists would now vote against the Good Friday Agreement?
ReplyDeletehttps://m.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/politics/a-majority-of-unionists-would-vote-against-1998-good-friday-agreement-today/43633102.html
Unionists are a declining minority of the population.
DeleteNorthern Ireland has come to realise, not least because of the kind of issues Johnny Mercer raised, just how right people like Charles Moore and Peter Hitchens were about the Good Friday Surrender.
ReplyDeletePut to a referendum now, it would be resoundingly rejected.
https://m.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/politics/a-majority-of-unionists-would-vote-against-1998-good-friday-agreement-today/43633102.html
Unionists are a declining minority of the population.
Delete