Thursday 25 April 2013

A Coup Had Taken Place

Although I am not sure about the General Belgrano (but the whole thing hangs like a stench over an otherwise noble war, albeit one that she herself caused by her incompetence), I defy anyone to read John Pilger, even only his first paragraph, and retain so much as the slightest regard for Margaret Thatcher:

In the wake of Thatcher's departure, I remember her victims. Patrick Warby's daughter, Marie, was one of them. Marie, aged five, suffered from a bowel deformity and needed a special diet. Without it, the pain was excruciating. Her father was a Durham miner and had used all his savings. It was winter 1985, the Great Strike was almost a year old and the family was destitute. Although her eligibility was not disputed, Marie was denied help by the Department of Social Security. Later, I obtained records of the case that showed Marie had been turned down because her father was "affected by a Trade dispute". 

The corruption and inhumanity under Thatcher knew no borders. When she came to power in 1979, Thatcher demanded a total ban on exports of milk to Vietnam. The American invasion had left a third of Vietnamese children malnourished. I witnessed many distressing sights, including infants going blind from a lack of vitamins. "I cannot tolerate this," said an anguished doctor in a Saigon paediatric hospital, as we looked at a dying boy. Oxfam and Save the Children had made clear to the British government the gravity of the emergency. An embargo led by the US had forced up the local price of a kilo of milk up to ten times that of a kilo of meat. Many children could have been restored with milk. Thatcher's ban held.

In neighbouring Cambodia, Thatcher left a trail of blood, secretly. In 1980, she demanded that the defunct Pol Pot regime - the killers of 1.7 million people - retain its "right" to represent their victims at the UN. Her policy was vengeance on Cambodia's liberator, Vietnam. The British representative was instructed to vote with Pol Pot at the World Health Organisation, thereby preventing it from providing help to where it was needed more than anywhere on earth.

To conceal this outrage, the US, Britain and China, Pol Pot's main backer, invented a "resistance coalition" dominated by Pol Pot's Khmer Rouge forces and supplied by the CIA at bases along the Thai border. There was a hitch. In the wake of the Irangate arms-for-hostages debacle, the US Congress had banned clandestine foreign adventures. "In one of those deals the two of them liked to make," a senior Whitehall official told the Sunday Telegraph, "President Reagan put it to Thatcher that the SAS should take over the Cambodia show. She readily agreed."

In 1983, Thatcher sent the SAS to train the "coalition" in its own distinctive brand of terrorism. Seven-man SAS teams arrived from Hong Kong, and British soldiers set about training "resistance fighters" in laying minefields in a country devastated by genocide and the world's highest rate of death and injury as a result of landmines.

I reported this at the time, and more than 16,000 people wrote to Thatcher in protest. "I confirm," she replied to opposition leader Neil Kinnock, "that there is no British government involvement of any kind in training, equipping or co-operating with the Khmer Rouge or those allied to them." The lie was breathtaking. In 1991, the government of John Major admitted to parliament that the SAS had indeed trained the "coalition".  "We liked the British," a Khmer Rouge fighter later told me. "They were very good at teaching us to set booby traps. Unsuspecting people, like children in paddy fields, were the main victims."

When the journalists and producers of ITV's landmark documentary, Death on the Rock, exposed how the SAS had run Thatcher's other death squads in Ireland and Gibraltar, they were hounded by Rupert Murdoch's "journalists", then cowering behind the razor wire at Wapping. Although exonerated, Thames TV lost its ITV franchise.

In 1982, the Argentine cruiser, General Belgrano, was steaming outside the Falklands exclusion zone. The ship offered no threat, yet Thatcher gave orders for it to be sunk. Her victims were 323 sailors, including conscripted teenagers. The crime had a certain logic. Among Thatcher's closest allies were mass murderers - Pinochet in Chile, Suharto in Indonesia, responsible for "many more than one million deaths" (Amnesty International). Although the British state had long armed the world's leading tyrannies, it was Thatcher who brought a crusading zeal to the deals, talking up the finer points of fighter aircraft engines, hard-bargaining with bribe-demanding Saudi princes. I filmed her at an arms fair, stroking a gleaming missile. "I'll have one of those!" she said.

In his arms-to-Iraq enquiry, Lord (Richard) Scott heard evidence that an entire tier of the Thatcher government, from senior civil servants to ministers, had lied and broken the law in selling weapons to Saddam Hussein. These were her "boys". Thumb through old copies of the Baghdad Observer, and there are pictures of her boys, mostly cabinet ministers, on the front page sitting with Saddam on his famous white couch. There is Douglas Hurd and there is a grinning David Mellor, also of the Foreign Office, around the time his host was ordering the gassing of 5,000 Kurds. Following this atrocity, the Thatcher government doubled trade credits to Saddam.

Perhaps it is too easy to dance on her grave. Her funeral was a propaganda stunt, fit for a dictator: an absurd show of militarism, as if a coup had taken place. And it has. "Her real triumph", said another of her boys, Geoffrey Howe, a Thatcher minister, "was to have transformed not just one party but two, so that when Labour did eventually return, the great bulk of Thatcherism was accepted as irreversible." 

In 1997, Thatcher was the first former prime minister to visit Tony Blair after he entered Downing Street. There is a photo of them, joined in rictus: the budding war criminal with his mentor. When Ed Milliband, in his unctuous "tribute", caricatured Thatcher as a "brave" feminist hero whose achievements he personally "honoured", you knew the old killer had not died at all.

14 comments:

  1. Ian Smith's Ghost26 April 2013 at 00:29

    How does anyone get away with declaring the sinking of the Belgrano a crime?

    How is it a crime to sink your enemies warships in a TIME OF WAR?

    Oh and look at that, a bit of sympathy for the IRA.

    ReplyDelete
  2. And the rest of this article? The refusal of assistance to the severely ill children of the miners? The aid to the Khmer Rouge?

    ReplyDelete
  3. The notorious old left-wing windbag Pilger has got his facts on the Falklands laughably wrong.

    The exclusion zone had been rendered irrelevant by a message communicated to the Argentine junta via the Swiss Embassy in Buenos Aires which informed them that ""Her Majesty's Government wishes to make clear that any approach on the part of Argentine warships...which could amount to a threat to interfere with the mission of British Forces in the South Atlantic will encounter the appropriate response.""

    Argentine Rear Admiral Allara confirmed "After that message of 23 April, the entire South Atlantic was an operational theatre for both sides."

    The ship's captain Hector Bonzo reaffirmed this "The [exclusion zone did not exclude danger or risks; it was all the same in or out. ""

    "I would like to be quite precise that, as far as I was concerned, the 200-mile limit was valid until 1 May, that is while diplomatic negotiations were taking place and/or until a real act of war took place, and that had happened on 1 May"".

    Major David Thorp settled the issue in 2011 by revealing that a report he prepared for Mrs Thatcher had confirmed the Belgrano was headed inside the exclusion zone at the time of the sinking.

    John Pilger ought to get his facts straight, before attacking Mrs Thatcher's perfectly lega, and just, actions in the Falklands.

    ReplyDelete
  4. And the rest of this article? The refusal of assistance to the severely ill children of the miners? The aid to the Khmer Rouge?

    I find Ian Smith's Ghost's love for Thatcher truly baffling, considering that she held out for Mugabe against Muzorewa and even procured him a knighthood.

    Add in Ceaușescu as well as Pol Pot to make the vitally important point that she was not anti-Communist. He was merely anti-Soviet.

    Even the dealings with China over Hong Kong, which admittedly would have had to have gone back anyway because that was the deal, fit into that pattern.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Ian Smith's Ghost.

    No surprise to see Pilger sympathising with the IRA-the man is a disgrace.

    Read David Horowitz, for a thorough debunking of Pilger's other charges against Thatcher.

    Peter Hitchens also dealt brilliantly with the famous (and utterly false) charge that Thatcher supported apartheid and condemned Nelson Mandela, in his documentary on Mandela.

    Mandela actually personally thanked Thatcher after his release. And the ANC was indeed a terrorist organisation at the time she criticised it.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Ian Smith's Ghost26 April 2013 at 00:50

    I want Pilger to release those documents about that girl since the only reference I can find to her is in the article. I'm sure as a journalist Pilger isn't above lying.

    Hopefully as quickly than those two miners who murdered a taxi driver got out of jail.

    Oh but beloved salt of the Earth of the Miners can do no wrong. Didn't they go on strike during the war to? How very nice of them.

    As for Rhodesia, yes, a terrible mistake on her part. Far worse than anything she did here. Maybe the beloved Miners should compare how hard life is for whites in Rhodesia now then there's are here.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Mandela actually personally thanked Thatcher after his release. And the ANC was indeed a terrorist organisation at the time she criticised it.

    You are confused, dear boy. Though not as confused as Ian Smith's Ghost.

    And the rest of this article? The refusal of assistance to the severely ill children of the miners? The aid to the Khmer Rouge? Add in Ceaușescu and Mugabe to make the vitally important point that she was not anti-Communist. She was merely anti-Soviet.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Ian Smith's Ghost, there are plenty of stories like that. And I mean plenty. That you have never read them in the London papers only tells you anything about the London papers. All of them. Or all of them that are allowed on the BBC and Sky News, anyway. This is how she is remembered up here. And rightly so.

    ReplyDelete
  9. You deny the ANC carried out terrorist atrocities?

    As for confusion, have you watched Peter Hitchens documentary? It shows very well that everything said about her, and Mandela, was a lie.

    ReplyDelete
  10. You are confused. Read what you originally wrote, and either you will see it, or you really ought not to come back.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I have read it.

    Mandela personally met and thanked Margaret Thatcher for her role in getting him released, after he got out.

    That's well-known. Where's the confusion?

    ReplyDelete
  12. In your original comment.

    You need to go to bed.

    ReplyDelete
  13. You haven't challenged or found a factual error in any part of the comment.

    Before publishing Pilger, you should have read David Horowitz's debunking of him-then you'd be less ignorant of the facts surrounding Thatcher.

    His whole article is based on fraud and propaganda.

    Horowitz should create an Anti-Pilger Reader to complement his Anti-Chomsky Reader series.

    ReplyDelete
  14. You really do need to go to bed. You are behaving exactly as children do when they are tired.

    And exactly as mediocre teenagers who think that they are clever do when confronted with anything that they did not already know, or think that they knew.

    If you are, as you are, used only to be told how clever that you are, then you have come to the wrong place here. Go to bed.

    ReplyDelete