"Her written evidence is, therefore, an inaccurate account of what happened and she has misled the committee on this matter. This is a potential breach of the ministerial code under the terms of section 1.3 (c)."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Says a committee composed of her political opponents.
ReplyDeleteAs the SNP said tonight, the committee’s judgment was a foregone conclusion.
Four SNP and a Green (so basically SNP), out of nine overall. Yet she has still lost. If you had won by five to four, as was the plan, then she would have been hailing her exoneration.
DeleteShe’s a brilliant political operator, too tough for them. As she says her only crime was to help women fight rich powerful men and stand up to Salmond’s “old boys club.”
ReplyDeleteGive over, her own handpicked committee has just called her a liar. A liar under oath, in fact, and a liar to Parliament.
DeleteThe vote broke down essentially on party lines with a 5-4 decision against the four SNP members.
ReplyDeleteProving that she is a political incompetent. She put that Green on because he was more or less SNP. Except that he wasn't.
Delete