If there really were going to be a crackdown on sexual assault in schools, and perhaps there does need to be, then at the very least boys ought not to be prosecuted for non-consensual sex when they could not have had consensual sex.
That anomaly has existed since 2003, when horsetrading among the feminist and gay groups around the Blair Government accidentally created a male heterosexual age of consent for the first time ever, while of course leaving the age of criminal responsibility at 10.
The minimum age for sex is 16, and the minimum age for sexually explicit images is 18. It is logically impossible to be a sexual assailant below the age of consent.
This crackdown, and its emphasis on private schools, have a vengeful air to them. Public schoolboys are going to be Prime Minister for the rest of this century, and that is precisely because the electorally decisive votes are now cast, not by the State femocracy, anti-industrial and pro-war, but by the people whom it spends its admittedly short working days persecuting. The census will confirm quite the extent to which the future now belonged to single men.
So the Furies are being unleashed, having learned nothing from the attempt to send Alex Salmond to his death in prison for, among other things, assaulting a woman after a dinner that it was proved in court that she had never attended. That was not a mere mistake. Yet our youth are now at mass risk of the same persecution.
No comments:
Post a Comment