James Bloodworth writes:
Largely
missed yesterday due to the Bank Holiday (and because it appeared in the
American press), former United States secretary of the treasury Larry Summers
has penned a piece for the Washington Post slamming
chancellor George Osborne’s policy of austerity.
A bit late now that Osborne’s “plan is working”, I can hear some of you say.
A bit late now that Osborne’s “plan is working”, I can hear some of you say.
But
Summers, who has previously criticised Osborne’s
Help to Buy scheme, has posited that, rather than growth vindicating the policy
of swingeing cuts, it’s wrong to take it as a sign of the wisdom of austerity.
Indeed, Britain’s economic growth is not a sign that austerity works, Summers
concluded based on four arguments:
1) While growth has been impressive recently, this is because the
depth of the recession was so deep
“Whereas
in the United States gross domestic product is well above its pre-crisis peak,
in Britain GDP remains below
previous peak levels and
even further short of levels predicted when austerity policies were
implemented.
“Not surprisingly, given this dismal record, the debt-to-GDP ratio
is now nearly 10 percentage points higher than was forecast, and the date when
budget balance will be achieved has been pushed years back to the end of the
decade.”
2) Britain’s reliance on financial services is not to blame
“The
most commonly offered excuse for Britain’s poor performance is its dependence
on financial services.
“Yet the New York metropolitan area, which is even more
dependent than London on financial services, has seen GDP comfortably outstrip
its previous peak.
“While the euro area has performed poorly, even a casual look
at trade statistics confirms that this cannot account for most of Britain’s
poor growth.”
3) Growth has returned to the British economy because treasury
policy has become less austere
“The
pace of fiscal contraction has slowed over the past two years.
“Slowing fiscal
contraction means the decrement to growth caused by fiscal policy becomes more
attenuated. Other things equal, this would be expected to produce more
favorable growth performance.
“Ironically, the greater the fiscal multiplier,
the greater would be the predicted turnaround when the pace of contraction
slowed.
“So the turnaround in growth over the past 18 months is as much evidence
against austerity as for austerity.”
4) The chancellor is relying on reckless policies to get the
economy growing
“Help
to Buy manages to recapitulate most of the sins of the U.S.
government-sponsored enterprises.
“The stated goal of the austerity program was
to improve confidence in Britain as a sovereign credit. Yet guaranteeing
mortgages en masse creates a huge potential government liability, as do other
loan-guarantee programs.
“Moreover, subsidized credit for housing risks
reinflating bubbles as house prices in London have risen much faster than GDP
over the past year.
“And, of course, all programs for the benefit of homeowners
rather than renters have perverse distributional consequences.”
So
in sum, the economic recovery is due in large part to a “combination of the
depth of the hole it found itself in, the moderation in the trend toward deeper
and deeper austerity, and the effects of possibly bubble-creating government
loans,” as Summers puts it.
No comments:
Post a Comment