Tuesday 4 September 2012

RespectAbility

Kate Hudson has withdrawn as the Respect candidate at Manchester Central. That constituency is less than one fifth ethnic minority, and those minorities are very diverse by any standards outside London. Respect had been on course to do well, giving the lie to the usual claims about it even more than did George Galloways win at Bradford West. In what had been a Conservative target seat in 2010, he topped the poll in every ward, including the 90 per cent white ones. But he has repeated his trick when he appeared on Celebrity Big Brother and cost his party half a dozen seats in the present hung Parliament.

There really is no Respect without Galloway. But the Labour Leadership is now in the hands of the candidate whom that non-Campaign Group and non-Tribune Group Eurosceptic, Scottish Unionist and pro-life Catholic would have nominated if he had still been a Labour MP. Galloway himself is now irreparably damaged goods. And Respect is riven between supporters and opponents of the Islamist insurrection in and invasion of Syria, with that division forming the background to the split between Galloway and Salma Yaqoob. It is time to call it a day.

Lucy Powell failed to win back Manchester Withington for Labour last time, and she has some unfortunate Blairite history, although perhaps she was just trying to get on. In any case, she is now employed by Ed Miliband. For that last reason, and now in the absence of anyone else, her resounding victory would endorse the only party that now advocates the Union as a first principle, and any concept of English identity. A universal postal service bound up with the monarchy, the Queen’s Highways rather than toll roads owned by faraway and unstable petrostates, Her Majesty’s Constabulary rather than the British KGB that is the impending “National Crime Agency”, and its own 1997 manifesto commitment to renationalise the railways. The National Health Service rather than piecemeal privatised provision by the American healthcare companies that pay Andrew Lansley. Keeping Sunday at least as special as the last Conservative Government left it.

The restoration both of energy independence and of the economic basis of paternal authority, through the reopening of the mines promised by Ed Miliband to one hundred thousand people and the television cameras at the Durham Miners’ Gala. The historic regimental system, and aircraft carriers with aircraft on them. No Falkland Islands oil to Argentina. The State action necessary in order to maintain the work of charities and of churches. The State action necessary in order to maintain a large and thriving middle class. A referendum on continued membership of the EU, explicitly and repeatedly ruled out by David Cameron and William Hague, but never by Ed Miliband. A free vote on the redefinition of marriage, very recently and half-heartedly conceded to Conservative MPs, but always guaranteed to Labour ones.

Labour is reverting to its historical norm as the voice and vehicle of a many-rooted social democratic patriotism in all directions, inclusive of social and cultural conservatives as well as social and cultural liberals, inclusive of rural as well as urban and suburban voices, inclusive of provincial as well as metropolitan contributions, and inclusive of religious as well as secular insights. The 2010 intake is very largely “classic Labour”, the boys in their dads’ suits having decided to sit out the hard work of Opposition. As a result, Labour has long enjoyed a commanding lead both in the opinion polls and at the actual polls.

But Labour came third or below in 211 constituencies in 2010, mostly places where it always does, and in most of those pretty distantly. However, the Coalition has changed the weather. The SNP will also be finished for at least a generation after the loss of the independence referendum in 2014. Imagine a formation which, while welcoming Labour’s present return to the historical norm set out above, was for that very reason fully aware that someone needed to keep Labour on that track or else stand ready to replace it.

Properly organised and sufficiently funded, such a formation could expect to win in 2015 about one third of those seats, i.e., around 70. That would be enough to make a very significant difference indeed, even to hold the balance of power in a hung Parliament. But it could only happen if the unions, most obviously, stumped up the cash. And it could only happen if Labour, with no realistic hope of winning those seats, stood aside in that formation’s favour.

Kate Hudson has written in the past bemoaning the absence in Britain of something taken for granted elsewhere in Western Europe, a party anchoring the Left while engaging fully in the battle of ideas at every level of cultural life and of the education system, while refusing to consign or to confine demotic culture to “the enormous condescension of posterity”, and while co-ordinating broad-based and inclusive campaigns for human rights and civil liberties, for peace (including nuclear, radiological, chemical and biological disarmament, and including against the arms trade), for environmental responsibility, and for the defence and extension of jobs, services and amenities.

Respect was never going to be that party. But this could be. This must be. This will be. If we make it happen. Let’s get on with it.

14 comments:

  1. I repeat my post of yesterday. You, David, are needed on this side of the Atlantic urgently and a place must be found for you to address our brethren

    ReplyDelete
  2. "Our brethren"?

    My mind boggles...

    About half of my readers are in America. Their own best hopes are Jon (of Economics Is For Donkeys), Matthew Franklin Cooper, Drew Bowling and Rob Rogala if they ever get their blogging act together or find some other outlet, and the presently scattered, but still communicating, PostRight boys.

    I am possibly the oldest of the last (the editor was three years younger than I was), with several under 30 even now. As are John, Matt, Drew and Rob. The rising generation. All is far from lost.

    ReplyDelete
  3. But they have not your internationalism of viewpoint and experience. Further, if an alliance of true freedom is to be built then it must be upon the ideas that you and your party state. For only through the furtherance of such views can salvation be found

    ReplyDelete
  4. I am not convinced by Rob Rogala, personally. Convince me.

    ReplyDelete
  5. For the time being, I do not have a party. At least arguably, neither have they.

    Their viewpoint is no less, nor any more, international than mine. Jack Ross is probably the most active for now.

    Do look up his Rabbi Outcast. His history of the American Socialist Party should be with us in the next couple of years.

    Drew is a fantasy writer of some importance, informed by orthodox Catholicism in all of its critique of liberal capitalism, liberal and capitalist. Do take a look.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I surely will as you have suggested it. Take care brother - we of truth are much maligned by the forces of capitalist darkness

    ReplyDelete
  7. Rob is the youngest of the lot of us. He's getting there. We're working on him.

    Matthew Pecorino, though an important ally as the movement emerges, might take a bit more work. But never say never.

    The godfather of the movement in America is of course Professor John C. Médaille.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Do you think your blog is actually relevant to the wider world?

    Interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  9. So the wider world keeps telling me.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Mr. Lindsay's blog is a most relevant blog - who is this person who casts such views - American will know that you are relevant and this person should see the light

    ReplyDelete
  11. I am arranging for Mr Lindsay to undertake a lecture tour in America - his message is especially relevant between now and the fall

    ReplyDelete
  12. Then I wouldn't go selling any tickets.

    I have promised a lot of people in America a visit some time in the next couple of years. How formal it will all be depends on intervening events.

    Now, on topic, please.

    ReplyDelete
  13. This makes a mockery of your post when you said Galloway's byelection victory would result in 15 - 20 Respect MPs after the next general election.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I never did say that. But it could have happened. Until this event. Rather like the half-dozen that there could have been in 2010 if it had not been for Celebrity Big Brother. That's our George...

    ReplyDelete