Many thanks to those who have pointed out that Oliver Kamm is up to his old tricks. Previously notable for absolutely nothing except a campaign of criminal harassment against Neil Clark, he seems to have moved on to a campaign of criminal harassment against me.
This allegedly left-wing warmonger, genocidal racist (he wants to kill every Arab, Serb and heaven knows who else in the world) and union-buster (the Guardian and the BBC use him because his inherited wealth is such that he doesn't need to be paid) is closely associated with the warmongering, genocidally racist, and union-busting website for those of fabulous inherited wealth, Harry's Place, the latest manifestation of the ferociously pro-Soviet, gulag-denying Straight Left faction within the old Communist Party of Great Britain and among its nominally Labour fellow-travellers.
About Me
- David Lindsay
- “Before Red Tory and Blue Labour there was David Lindsay. He was arguably the first to announce a postliberal politics of paradox, and to delve into the deep, unwritten British past in order to craft, theoretically, an alternative British and international future. It is high time that the singular and yet wholly pertinent writings of this County Durham Catholic Labour prophet receive a wider circulation.” Professor John Milbank, Professor in Religion, Politics and Ethics, University of Nottingham.
Donate
Links
- Follow me on Twitter
- Durham Miners' Association
- Coalition for Marriage
- Better Together
- Campaign Against Sanctions and Military Intervention in Iran
- The Catholic Herald
- The London Progressive Journal - it publishes me regularly
- My London Progresive Journal articles
- Bryan Gould's London Progressive Journal articles
- Shifting Grounds
- The Morning Star - I part-own it...
- Independent Labour Publications
- Sally from Saar - the view from inside Bahrain
- Eccles and Bosco is saved
- Sui Juris - Plumstead Letters
- Blue Labour
- Democratic Labor Party of Australia
- Senator John Madigan
- Australian Party
- Gibraltar Socialist Labour Party
- National Liberation Party of Costa Rica
- Christian Liberation Movement of Cuba
- PostRight
- The Distributist Review
- Social Democracy for the 21st Century
- Reclaiming Vatican II
- Care Not Killing
- Drug Prevention Education
- The Kamm Scam: "Fake 'Journalist' Defends A Forgery"
- The Oliver Kamm School of Falsification
- Arrest Blair
- Blair War Crimes Foundation
- British Helsinki Human Rights Group
- Global Warming Policy Foundation
- Keep The Post Public
- NO2EU, Yes To Democracy
- UK Chagos Support Blog
- Defend Peaceful Protest
- Balanced Migration
- Campaign for Public Ownership
- Ronan Dodds
- John - Economics Is For Donkeys
- Matthew Franklin Cooper
- Owen Jones
- Peter Hitchens
- Peter Oborne
- Liam Carr
- Patrick Carr
- Neil Clark
- Michael Merrick
- Rod Liddle
- Stuart James
- Pub Philosopher
- Ann Farmer
- Red Maria
- Tom Miller
- Ed West
- Paul Leake
- Fr Tim Finigan
- Fr Ray Blake
- Fr Michael Brown
- Fr David Barrett
- Fr Jonathan Hill
- Fr Nicholas Schofield
- Fr Dwight Longenecker
- Godzdogz
- Alrite, Watson?
- Paul Priest
- Paul Mallinder
- Andrew Cusack
- Lord (David) Alton
- John Smeaton
- Joanna Bogle
- Pontesisto
- Laurence England
- Ipsum Esse
- The Pittsford Perennialist
- The Western Confucian
- Leos Tomicek
- The Ubiquarian
- The Sign of The Cross
- The Ramshackle Recusant
- Vic the Vicar
- Fitzjames Horse
- Chris Paul
- Malcolm Clarke
- Paul Leake
- Martin Meenagh
- Charlie Marks
- Anglo Noel
- Ian's Red Log
- Iain Dale's Diary
- Paul Routledge
- Craig Murray
- Neil Craig
- Martin Kelly
- The Thirsty Gargoyle
- Mara MacSeoinin
- Michael Patey
- Matthew Revell
- Scott Lomax
- Little Man, What Now?
- Ken Bell
- Tim Collard
- Radical Royalist
- John C Médaille
- Kevin Michael Grace
- Red Tory
- Dred Tory
- The Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity
- Senator Bob Casey
- Representative Marcy Kaptur
- Right Democrat
- Mainstream Populist Democrats
- Left Conservative
- Elizabeth Wright
- USS Liberty Memorial
Followers
22 comments:
What's he done? I just looked at his blog and I don't think he's posted anything about you on it. What's he said and where's he said it?
Over on a thread (to which he had already contributed under his own name) at the Spectator, he or one of his minions has been pulling off a recurring stunt of affecting a name (it's always the same one) and reprinting a previous contribution of mine word for word. Hilarious, isn't it?
How do you know that had anything to do with him?
Form. Even if his was not the hand that did that deed, it was ceratinly the hand that guided.
Form? So this is a pattern of behaviour? What has he done to you in the past, and how do you know it was him then?
Oh, exactly this trick, complete with the same assumed name every time, has been used repeatedly on threads to which we have both contributed. It's completely blatant.
So, in other words, you don't know it was him and you don't really have evidence - you just suspect him.
Anyway, how does leaving comments under a false name, quoting your own comments, on a website constitute criminal harassment? If he did it, what law(s) has he broken?
I don't expect any repetition.
No, that's not the question. Seriously, what law has he broken?
We'll see, if he does it again.
He does seem to have laid off Neil. He's not used to being taken on, so he has no idea how to cope with it. Well, he'd better get used to it if he gives me any more bother.
But the point of my question is that if you're alleging "criminal harassment", then you must have some sort of criminal standard in mind. I honestly can't understand why you wouldn't say what it is, unless you don't know what the law is and therefore don't know whether he's breaking it.
He's broken it before and he's doing so now. But he runs away and hides if anyone confronts him. As I am now doing.
WHAT LAW HAS HE BROKEN?
It's a serious question, and you're not answering it. Please don't run away and hide when you're confronted. That's the kind of thing Oliver Kamm would do - surely you're better than him. Aren't you?
And we'll let him answer that, if there is any repetition.
No, David. That's pathetic. You can't answer a simple question about whether an allegation you're making has any substance.
I'm genuinely disappointed in you.
Is this the kind of thing you're talking about?
Is it criminal harassment by Oliver Kamm?
What law does it break?
I've given you the substance. We'll see if he thinks he's on firm ground if there is any repetition. And in that event, we'll then see if he's right.
Yes, but I'm changing tactic after this. He or his little helpers (they really do exist, poor souls) are clearly waging this particualr campaign specifically in relation to my opposition to the Human Fertilsation and Embryology Bill. And there's a reason for that... Watch this space.
You haven't given the substance, because the allegation has two parts:
1) Oliver Kamm is responsible for a certain action.
2) This action meets a criminal legal threshold for "harassment".
You haven't demonstrated the first, because we don't know it's Kamm, and you haven't demonstrated the second, because you haven't even begun to say what law you think he might have broken.
There are things that I cannot discuss on the Internet, and we are touching on them.
The law is not a secret. It would be really silly if it were.
But other things are.
I'm ending this thread now. The matter in hand has outgrown it.
Post a Comment