Outraging Public Decency

Everything short of the giant shapeshifting reptilians has turned to have been true. With that caveat, ruling out extraterrestrials and what have you, I for one apologise unreservedly for my long castigation of those whom I considered to be harming the cause by in fact alleging less than had now been confirmed even in the redacted Epstein Files.

With Keir Starmer comes Morgan McSweeney, with McSweeney comes Peter Mandelson, and with Mandelson comes the rest of Jeffrey Epstein’s vast surviving entourage. Since it is within the power of Labour MPs to remove Starmer as Prime Minister, then as long as they failed to so, they should be considered safeguarding risks, and denied access to children and to vulnerable adults, for example in their constituencies’ schools and old people’s homes.

The word has gone out that Starmer was to be described as “decent”. Starmer gave Jenny Chapman a peerage, made her an Under-Secretary of State, promoted her to Minister of State, appointed her to the Privy Council, and invited her to attend Cabinet, all because, while Starmer’s wife was pregnant, Chapman had borne him the child who was now supported by Chapman’s Ministerial salary. How decent.

There was recently a fifth arrest in relation to Ukrainian rent boys of whom three had already been charged with arson with intent to endanger life in relation to the attacks on Starmer’s rented out house, his old flat, and his old car. From that, to Lord Alli, to the child whom Starmer fathered with a junior barrister when he was Director of Public Prosecutions, sit back and smell the decency.

Starmer is decent only if fiscal drag, and a 50 per cent increase in workers’ bus fares, are decent. Starmer is decent only if falling growth, galloping inflation, and mass unemployment, are decent. Starmer is decent only if it is decent to refuse to guarantee employment rights from day one of employment, or to fail to abolish leasehold. Starmer is decent only if it is decent to increase employers’ National Insurance contributions so as to destroy charities and small businesses while making it impossible for big businesses to take on staff or to increase wages.  Starmer is decent only if it is decent to force working farmers of many decades’ standing who formally inherited their parents’ farms to sell them to giant American agribusinesses.

Will Britain be more decent once it was rightly illegal to boil a lobster alive, but legal to abort a child at nine months’ gestation, or to assist the suicide of her mother, including on grounds of financial poverty? Will Britain be more decent once no one was allowed social media until the new voting age of 16, two years below the school leaving age that would soon be the age of conscription, but there was no minimum age for experimental puberty blockers the adverse effects of which had already caused them to be banned in sheep that had almost certainly made their way into the human food chain?

Is it decent to cancel local elections at all, never mind as a way of softening people up for the “postponement” of the next General Election? Is it decent to deny self-determination to the Chagossian people? Would it be decent to abolish almost all trial by jury, and to remove the automatic right of appeal to the Crown Court from the Magistrates’ Court that had been empowered to impose custodial sentences of two years? Was it decent to freeze pensioners? Was it decent to starve children in Britain? Is it decent to provide arms, intelligence and training for the bombing of children and the elderly in Gaza by those who had demolished part of Gaza’s Allied war cemetery, beautifully maintained since 1923 by the Palestinian Jaradah family?

Would digital ID be decent, either in itself, or as delivered by the Tony Blair Institute and thus by Donald Trump’s Board of Peace? Would mass facial recognition be decent, either in itself, or as delivered by the Palantir for which Mandelson had corruptly obtained British public contracts, but which was rejected at least nine times in seven years by Swiss federal agencies and the Swiss Army because it was a risk to national security and to neutrality?

Mandelson also persuaded a reluctant Blair to press ahead with Horizon in the Post Office, and the death of John Burton is a reminder that he had been all ready to contest Hartlepool in 1992, until Blair had talked him out of it in favour of Mandelson. 32 years later, Mandelson conferred the new seat of Hamilton and Clyde Valley on Imogen Walker, whom four months later he appointed as an Assistant Whip. But is her husband, McSweeney, even a British citizen? If not, then he ought to be deported. Or if so, then he has done immensely more damage to this country than Shamima Begum ever has, and unlike her he was not born British. Take it away from him. And then deport him.