Peter Hitchens writes:
A month ago I warned that simple-minded Western
intervention in Ukraine risked provoking civil war in that dangerous,
unstable region.
Now I repeat the warning. Our encouragement of
this post-modern putsch now threatens the worst civil violence in Europe
since similar lobbies sponsored the break-up of Yugoslavia.
Worse may be on the way. Ukraine is steeped in
blood and carpeted with unquiet graves.
Twice in the past century it has been
the scene of terrible wars, and also the site of a hideous man-made
famine and of genocidal slaughter.
It is also a great strategic prize – fertile
wheat fields, coal mines, the crucial warm-water naval port of
Sevastopol.
Now it is the gateway for the colossal new gas
and oil fields around the Caspian Sea.
Most Western politicians and commentators seem to
assume that the Kiev mob are democrats. Are they? In what way?
They demanded the resignation of the Ukrainian
government, because they said so. They wouldn’t go home until they got their
way.
How is that democratic? President Yanukovych is
certainly no saint. But he came to power legitimately.
In 2010, Yanukovych won office for five years
with 12.5 million votes (48.9 per cent) against 11.6 million votes
(45.5 per cent) for Yulia Tymoshenko.
That’s rather better than David Cameron
(10.7 million, 36.1 per cent) did against Gordon Brown (8.6 million, 29.0
per cent) in our 2010 poll.
So what precisely is ‘democratic’ about demanding
the immediate removal of a lawfully elected head of state, who has a year of
his mandate still to run? It sounds more like mob rule to me.
And yet, on the BBC’s supposedly enlightened and
thoughtful World Tonight radio programme, an academic was allowed to describe
this government as a ‘regime’ without challenge, and a series of politicians
from Eastern Europe were brought on to demand sanctions against Ukraine, while
no voice was heard from the other side.
Anyway, who are these demonstrators?
There is no doubt that police have been injured by petrol bombs thrown from the
crowd, and shot at with guns. Yet the reports seldom seem to ask who is
doing the throwing and the shooting.
Nor do they often mention the Pravy Sektor (Right
Sector), a nasty formation of violent football fans, prominent in the
riots. These ‘democrats’ consider the larger Svoboda party as too namby-pamby.
But you wouldn’t.
Svoboda (Freedom) is led by Oleh Tyahnybok. He was once expelled from the Kiev parliament for claiming that a ‘Muscovite-Jewish Mafia’ controlled the country. Charming, eh? Kiev was the scene, in 1941, of the Babi Yar massacre of 30,000 Jews by German troops.
Svoboda (Freedom) is led by Oleh Tyahnybok. He was once expelled from the Kiev parliament for claiming that a ‘Muscovite-Jewish Mafia’ controlled the country. Charming, eh? Kiev was the scene, in 1941, of the Babi Yar massacre of 30,000 Jews by German troops.
Many of the more fervent Ukrainian nationalists,
especially those from the Western city of Lviv, are keen worshippers of the
memory of a character called Stepan Bandera, who collaborated with the Nazis on
and off between 1941 and 1945.
It is these people who have been
receiving the support of the United States.
Assistant Secretary of State
Victoria Nuland is famous for her ‘**** the EU!’ statement in a
bugged phone conversation in which she discusses naked intervention by the USA
in Ukraine’s affairs.
But last December she trotted round the main
square of Kiev with a little plastic bag, handing out biscuits and buns to
demonstrators.
Other outsiders who have sided with the anti-democratic
mob have included German foreign minister Guido Westerwelle, and the EU’s
foreign policy chief, Baroness Ashton.
Didn’t these people realise what effect their
endorsement might have? Do they know what ghosts they may raise?
If they don’t,
they are ignorant and rash.
If they do, they should remember what happens to
children who play with fire.
No comments:
Post a Comment