Saturday, 25 May 2013

Restricting The Preachers of Hate

Not before time.

And including no shortage of Islamists. Such as the black-shirted pimp and heroin-trafficker Hashim Thaçi, who is somehow also both a Wahhabi and a Maoist – he really is what the more hysterical Tea Party attendees imagine President Obama to be.

Such as the terrorist Akhmed Zakayev, whom this country currently harbours. Such as the war criminal Ejup Ganić. Such as those who hold fast to the late terrorist Abdulmalik Rigi. And such as those who adhere to Thaçi, Zakeyev and Ganić. Among other Islamist preachers of hate.
 
Themselves among numerous others besides. Ecclesiastics who have expressed racist views about Africans and others who do not share their liberal sexual morality. Those whose disparagement of Blessed John Paul the Great’s Polishness echo the authentic voice of the age-old Teutonic racism against the Slavs, who only gets away with it because he is Swiss.

Supporters of Avigdor Lieberman. Cheerleaders for the EDL-supporting leaders of the Tea Party. Partisans of Geert Wilders, the heir of Pim Fortuyn and of his definition of Western civilisation as sex between men and boys. Advocates of sex between men and boys. Admirers of the American neoconservatives. Campaigners for Hindutva or for Khalistan. Rupert Murdoch.

Nor does the list end there. It has hardly even begun.

5 comments:

  1. We are right to keep Zakayev here-and long may he stay under Her Majesty's protection.

    If Akhmed Zakayev is a terrorist, what is the word for the country that "dissappeared" thousands of his people into Pinochet-esque torture chambers, raped and murdered Chechen civilians without sanction and razed entire towns to the ground, in a secret war which its journalists are murdered for reporting on?

    Read anything by Amnesty International on Chechnya to discover who the real terrorists are.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ah, the unceasing alliance between neocons and Islamists. Even when the latter bomb the Boston Marathon, as Zakayev's supporters have recently done.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Been going through this list seeing how many Oliver Kamm falls into. At least half of them. Maybe more.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm not a neocon.

    You have to be an "Islamist" to oppose the rape of Chechnya? That proud nation was a secular state with a secular President for its brief period of semi-independence, despite constant Russian political interference, economic strangulation and false-flag flat bombs to justify their 1999 oil-grab invasion.

    It says alot about your ignorance that you think Boston was even comparable to what Russia has been doing to the Chechen people for the last two decades

    ReplyDelete
  5. There's the point proved, then. Boston justified. Barmy Islamist propaganda about Chechnya. It's all in place.

    Anyone-against-Russia is always a neocon marker, partly because of the Trotskyist roots of neoconservatism. You are one, by definition.

    @19:00, a cause for restriction, indeed. He tried to pass himself off on Neil Clark's latest American Conservative piece recently.

    They found him out because he denied having anything in common with the "Leftist" Kamm. The only person who would ever call Kamm even vaguely left-wing, never mind a Leftist, is Kamm himself.

    ReplyDelete