Matthew Franklin Cooper writes:
David Lindsay writes:
The striking dockers
and other demonstrators in Hong Kong, increasingly one of the most interesting
places in the world politically, are waving flags from the Colonial period
"as an act of provocation".
Provocation of whom?
Hong Kong was never British territory, being only ever under lease. Therefore,
neither independence, nor the status of a British Overseas Territory in
perpetuity (like all of those which still remain), was ever going to be an
option there.
To our shame, we put in
place far too little in the way of representative democracy, ordered liberty,
workers' right or social welfare provisions in order to make the place a beacon
for their eventual extension to the whole of China. Clearly, though, we put in
place enough to light the spark.
If the waving of the
old flags means anything, then it means that. And the eventual extension of
representative democracy, ordered liberty, workers' right and social welfare
provisions to the whole of China will be more than a fair exchange for the
British acquisition of a love of Cantonese food.
Mr Lindsay, as ever, is
bang-on about this, in my humble opinion: if the strikers were waving British
flags it is not out of nostalgia or a desire for a reinstitution of British
colonial government, but rather as a reminder of what Britain had promised them
but not delivered, especially in the way of worker rights and social welfare.
After all, why else would Coeng Mou, the leader of the Social-Democratic League (Se-Wui Man-Jyu Lin-Sin, 社會民主連線) political party, throw plastic faeces at CY Leung for criticising the protesters whilst wearing a T-shirt emblazoned with the image of Ernesto Guevara, of whom, whatever else might be said of either of them, it can hardly be claimed that they pine for the British Empire?
After all, why else would Coeng Mou, the leader of the Social-Democratic League (Se-Wui Man-Jyu Lin-Sin, 社會民主連線) political party, throw plastic faeces at CY Leung for criticising the protesters whilst wearing a T-shirt emblazoned with the image of Ernesto Guevara, of whom, whatever else might be said of either of them, it can hardly be claimed that they pine for the British Empire?
The strike has ended;
the results were decidedly mixed, though there is reason for hope in the
future. The redoubtable Ellen David Friedman has sent to the riseup mailing
list this translation of a letter from the HKCTU:
On 6 May, UHKD received
a written confirmation jointly signed by the four contractors of HIT, Everbest,
Comcheung, Lem Wing and Pui Kee via the Labour Department. The four companies
confirmed the new salary plan of 9.8% increase in the basic wage for all their
employees at different works in the Kwai Chung Contrainer Terminals, effective
for one year from 1 May 2013.
In the workers’ meeting called by UHKD in the evening, members considered the written assurance by the four contractors with the Labour Department a step forward compared to the verbal, unilateral announcement these companies made on 3 May.
Although the strike has not secured a collective bargaining agreement with the employers, the 40-day industrial action has broken the “tradition” of unilateralism and succeeded in forcing the contractors to seal a written confirmation about the pay and working conditions. UHKD believes that this is the first step towards building a mechanism of communication and negotiation between the employers and the union representing a large section of the contractual workers in the Hong Kong terminals.
In the workers’ meeting called by UHKD in the evening, members considered the written assurance by the four contractors with the Labour Department a step forward compared to the verbal, unilateral announcement these companies made on 3 May.
Although the strike has not secured a collective bargaining agreement with the employers, the 40-day industrial action has broken the “tradition” of unilateralism and succeeded in forcing the contractors to seal a written confirmation about the pay and working conditions. UHKD believes that this is the first step towards building a mechanism of communication and negotiation between the employers and the union representing a large section of the contractual workers in the Hong Kong terminals.
The four contractors’
written confirmation also gives details committing the employers to “improve
the occupational safety and health protection with the terminal companies”, as
well as providing the crane operators the right “to stop the machine to take
lunch freely”, and “leave their workplace for toilet”. Members of UHKD decide
that these concrete commitments are important basis for the union to continue
the engagement with the contractors and HIT in good faith in the future.
While calling an end to
the strike, the union is now working to assist the re-employment of its
members, particularly the hundred crane operators employed by Global
Stevedoring which announced its closure on 18 April. The union is pressing the
Labour Department to negotiate with all the contractors for the soonest
possible re-employment of these members.
UHKD will see to the
end that the contractors abide by their promise of non-retaliation; and that
none of its members will be penalized in the future for having taken part in
the strike. The union will follow up to demand the contractors and HIT for a
mechanism to schedule the rest and lunch breaks, enforce the safety and health
provisions, review the salary regularly and eventually establish a collective
bargaining mechanism that includes the contractual workers in the terminals.
The passionate support
and generous donations of the Hong Kong community, the international trade
unions and organizations have helped us to sustain the strike for forty days.
On behalf of our members, UHKD is thankful to all of you who have been giving
us unwavering support. Together with you, we have demonstrated again the
importance of workers’ unity in fighting not only for reasonable pay, but also
our dignity and our future.
It is the time for Hong
Kong SAR government to re-table the legislation on collective bargaining,
scrapped by the government in 1997, in obligations under the ILO Convention
No98. The working people in Hong Kong must have an internationally recognized
mechanism on collective bargaining to ensure the right to fair negotiation of
their working conditions and protection of the unions they belong to.
--
蔡泳詩 Wing Sze, Choi 統籌幹事 Project Coordinator 香港職工會聯盟 Hong Kong Confederation of Trade Unions
Godspeed to the Hong
Kong Confederation of Trade Unions in keeping up the struggle and pressing for
more protections for the working people of Hong Kong, who have a really tough
break at the moment.
No comments:
Post a Comment