Of course there ought to be secular humanists on SACREs.
Although that rarely happens, it is best practice, according to page 21 of the PDF, which sets out the national non-statutory guidlines.
Perhaps there ought to be secular humanists on Thought for the Day? But I reckon that the noisiest among them would run a mile if the offer were ever made in all seriousness.
Atheism is not neutral, as it adherents concede every time that complain, sometimes rightly, about discrimination against them.
Perhaps there ought to be secular humanists on Thought for the Day? But I reckon that the noisiest among them would run a mile if the offer were ever made in all seriousness.
Atheism is not neutral, as it adherents concede every time that complain, sometimes rightly, about discrimination against them.
There's already a few secular humanists commenting on TFTD - Giles Fraser and Vincent Nichols immediately spring to mind here.
ReplyDeleteBut seriously, I don't think I've heard an orthodox Christian contribution on that show for years. It's a canard that it's a religious program anymore, if indeed it ever was. It's a typical BBC Marxist propaganda machine. Why fight over it?
I think that we can imagine your definition of "an orthodox Christian contribution".
ReplyDelete