Congratulations to the British Falkland Islanders, including
the large Saint Helenian community there.
But with the American lease up next year, when are the
British Chagos Islanders going to get their referendum? When is the Labour Whip
going to be withdrawn from Lord Healey unless and until he publicly apologises
for his treatment of them? They remain proudly British, doubtless a
contributing factor when the famous David Miliband lied to Parliament in order
to create the world's largest marine reserve where they are properly entitled
to live, thereby ensuring that they could never return while it remained in
place. Over to his brother.
When is there going to be, while not a referendum,
nevertheless at least a Commons vote right here in the United Kingdom on David
Cameron's policy of giving Argentina a share of Falklands oil revenue even
without any concession or negotiation on the sovereignty question, a policy
announced in the last Parliament but studiously ignored by the Cameron-fawning
Blairite media?
And when is there going to be some effort to win back the
good will of those Commonwealth countries, even with the Queen as Head of
State, which have nevertheless voted with Argentina in the OAS because we have
so alienated them by our whoring after the (fiercely and inevitably
pro-Argentine) American imperium in general and the EU in particular?
Or to make common cause against an Argentine regime, more
democratic, but no less right-wing, than Galtieri's was, by appealing to the
anti-consumerist, organic community-valuing Pepe Mujica of Uruguay, the country
created by Britain specifically not to be Argentina? Those on the Falklands
requiring serious medical attention are taken to Montevideo to this day. But
for how much longer? Ongoing developments are strongly redolent of Peronist and
kindred tendencies. Greater Argentina does not only mean the end of the British
Falkland Islands. Greater Argentina also means the end of Uruguay. Bilateral
ties around the world. And since it now includes African countries with no
British imperial past, the Commonwealth.
But instead, we have favoured American hegemony and its pet
projects, Mercosur as much as the EU and vice versa, over the Commonwealth, the
BRICS countries (two of which are Commonwealth members, while a third is
left-wing Brazil of Lula, with no good reason to love Kirchner), and, I say
again, bilateral ties around the world. Our engagement with the Americas should
be as an American country seven times over, since the Falkland Islands,
Bermuda, Anguilla, Montserrat, the Cayman Islands, the British Virgin Islands,
and the Turks & Caicos Islands are each and all British by choice,
whatever the United States or anyone else might think.
When is there going to be some effort to make common cause
with Evo Morales of Bolivia, the standard-bearer of indigeneity, expressed not least
as the nationalisation of foreign gas interests in his country, against
centuries of abuse and oppression by a white Latino minority which bears more
than a passing resemblance to the ruling element in Argentina? The Falkland
Islanders are, of course, the descendants of the first human inhabitants there.
They did not dispossess anyone. Rather, white Latino chauvinism is seeking to
dispossess them.
Rafael Correa's Ecuador would be a harder nut to crack. But
it can, and therefore it must, be done. And then, there is Venezuela. Like all
of the above, this engagement must be on the basis of what it is to be, as the
Falkland Islanders have just reiterated so powerfully that they are, British.
The British Overseas Territories are British by choice, and those which remain even now always will be. The same is true of the Crown Dependencies. To be British is to be not just any, but at some level all, of English, Scots, Welsh, Irish, Manx, Channel Islander, Mediterranean, North American, Caribbean, Southern African Creole, Indian Ocean Creole, Polynesian, and South American in the sense of a product of the British "informal empire" that once dominated South America.
The British Overseas Territories are British by choice, and those which remain even now always will be. The same is true of the Crown Dependencies. To be British is to be not just any, but at some level all, of English, Scots, Welsh, Irish, Manx, Channel Islander, Mediterranean, North American, Caribbean, Southern African Creole, Indian Ocean Creole, Polynesian, and South American in the sense of a product of the British "informal empire" that once dominated South America.
Sort out the problem of the British tax havens. But do so
while charging the British people of the Overseas Territories and the Crown
Dependencies only home fees to study at British universities. Do so while
building the airport on Saint Helena, which is essential to the defence of the
Falkland Islands, and while holding a proper inquiry into the healthcare
situation on Saint Helena.
Do so while giving justice to the Ascension Islanders and to the Chagossians, in both cases regardless of what a foreign power might think. Do so while restoring the BBC English for the Caribbean Service. And do so, I say again, while recanting David Cameron's pre-Election pledge, barely reported by his media creators, to give a share of Falkland Islands oil revenue to Argentina without requiring the slightest movement on the sovereignty question.
Do so while giving justice to the Ascension Islanders and to the Chagossians, in both cases regardless of what a foreign power might think. Do so while restoring the BBC English for the Caribbean Service. And do so, I say again, while recanting David Cameron's pre-Election pledge, barely reported by his media creators, to give a share of Falkland Islands oil revenue to Argentina without requiring the slightest movement on the sovereignty question.
To choose to be, including to remain, British is to choose the
Welfare State, workers' rights, trade unionism, the co-operative movement and
wider mutualism, consumer protection, strong communities, fair taxation, full
employment, pragmatic public ownership, proper local government, a powerful
Parliament, the organic Constitution, national and parliamentary sovereignty,
civil liberties, law and order, the Union, the ties that bind these Islands,
the Commonwealth, economic patriotism, energy independence, balanced migration,
the countryside, traditional structures and methods of education, traditional
moral and social values, a realist foreign policy which includes strong
national defence, peace (including the total eradication of nuclear,
radiological, chemical and biological weapons), an unhysterical approach to
climate change, and the need for a base of real property for every household
from which to resist both over-mighty commercial interests and an over-mighty
State.
Insofar as they can, the devolved bodies in Wales, and to a
considerable extent in Scotland and in Northern Ireland, are still maintaining
recognisably British territories. But is anyone doing so in the Falkland
Islands, among other places? Is anyone doing so in England? It is still the
wish of the English to be British. Who is offering them that electoral choice?
Ed Miliband, whose mother is and whose father was British by
choice, over to you.
Oh, why aren't you in Parliament, David? Why aren't you in the Cabinet?
ReplyDeleteI ma too busy as between putting up your post and writing this, on Lanchester Parish Council. Where we get far more done. Seriously.
ReplyDeleteAstute observations a ever David.Britain must never abandon it's overseas dependencies. Looking beyond our obvious obligations and relationships, during Cameron's recent futile visit to India, Michael Ancram proposed something he called "Neo- Commonwealthianism". Good name, but how ridiculous using such a term for seeking to revive a relationship with a sub-continent that has long since moved on. Rather than Neo-Commonwealthianism, what he had in mind was in fact simply neo-liberalism for the banks. Why not have the courage to say goodbye to countries like India and even Australia/NZ that have forged different economic ties and instead encourage neighbours such as Ireland to rejoin. Perhaps moving the HQ of the Commonwealth to Gibraltar might help in that. Even more fundamentally, it could be used as a body to build a new economic relationship with Africa, that could still be a source of raw matrials for a revival of manufacturing in Britain, but this time on the basis of co operation, partnership and mutual advantage.
ReplyDelete- Bernard Daly