Has no one made a formal complaint about Andrew Mitchell's crime?
If anyone did, then Mitchell would be arrested, or at the very least interviewed under caution, which would also make his position untenable.
One for the Labour Whips Office.
If anyone did, then Mitchell would be arrested, or at the very least interviewed under caution, which would also make his position untenable.
One for the Labour Whips Office.
Do you still think Savile was innocent or are you going to pretend you never said it? How is the "book of responses" going? What's that, it's another lie and you made it all up?
ReplyDeleteI never said it, as you know.
ReplyDeleteI am told that it is coming along swimmingly, although obviously it is not my project.
On topic, please.
All you ever said was "If Damian Thompson says he was guilty, he must be innocent" or words to that effect. Obviously the view of the newspaper he remains a director of, where eight hours after you posted it the following comment of yours still appears under William Oddie's blog post on Jimmy Savile:
ReplyDelete"When Fr Kit Cunningham died and his taste for boys was exposed, the then Editor-in-Chief who had appointed him to this newspaper informed the world, like Esther Rantzen in relation to Jimmy Savile, that "everyone who was anyone always knew that, dahhhling". Had it actually been a condition of his employment during that, mercifully concluded, era in this publication's history?"
Mercifully concluded, all right. Driven from the Herald. How long before he is driven from the lunatic asylum with its revolving door in a tailspin that he has turned Telegraph Blogs into? You have done it once, Mr. Lindsay. Do it again.
Thank you for referring me back over to the Catholic Herald. Once there, I found the Aleppo article. But on topic, please.
ReplyDelete