Although the platform commitment to taxpayer-funded abortion does give the lie to the claim that ObamaCare already provides for it (it does not, whereas RomneyCare does), Tom Hoopes writes:
It’s time for Catholics to lead true Democrats to start their own party. Catholic Democrats are in a terrible quandary. They vehemently disagree with
the Republicans’ approach to policy, so they won’t vote for them. And since the Democratic Party’s leaders stand against religious liberty and
for taxpayer-funded abortion, as well as support for stripping marriage of its
meaning and endless war, they morally can’t vote for many Democrats
either. The only viable option for a traditional Democrat is to not vote at all.
It’s a terrible travesty that this has come to pass. It is crucially
important that we have at least two morally viable parties proposing solutions
to America’s problems. I remember a time years ago when one of my daughters asked me why some
Catholics we knew were Democrats and some were Republicans. “Well, usually Catholics vote Republican because the party platform is
pro-life,” I told her. “The Republican Party platform is against abortion. The
Democratic platform is all for it.” “Well, how can Catholics be Democrats then?” she asked. “Many of them are convinced that Republicans are too pro-war because of the
Republican Party's pro-war reputation,” I told her. “And the Democrats used to
be known for sticking up for the little guy — before they became so
pro-abortion.” “Aren’t there any political parties that are pro-life and anti-war?” she
asked. I winced. “No, there isn’t,” I said. “Well, there should be,” she said.
Yes, there should. Catholic Democrats should make it so. Many Catholics became Democrats back in the days when John F. Kennedy stood
on the Declaration of Independence principle “that the rights of man come not
from the generosity of the state, but from the hand of God.” Now, with the HHS mandate, Democrats are legislating as if freedom of
religion is a state-given privilege, not a God-given right. And they changed
their platform in much the same way. I already wrote about God-gate. Many Catholics became Democrats back when Sen. Edward Kennedy, Al Gore, Bill
Clinton and Jesse Jackson were
pro-life. Since then, the platform of the Democratic Party has changed to
be reliably pro-abortion. This year, Democratic Party holds that every woman
should be able to abort her child “regardless of ability to pay.” In other words, the Democratic Party officially wants to take money out of
the paychecks of every taxpayer in America and hand that money to abortion
businesses to pay for abortions.
That’s an extreme position, but the platform doubles down on it with the
next line: “We oppose any and all efforts to weaken or undermine that right.” The convention featured a speaker who spelled out what is considered “any
and all efforts to weaken” the “right” to Internal Revenue Service-enforced
paycheck-to-abortionist transfers. “We believe that a woman considering an abortion should not be forced to
have an ultrasound against her will,” Nancy Keenan of NARAL (National Abortion
Rights Action League) Pro-Choice America told delegates. So, if a state’s
voters refuse to keep women in the dark about what abortion is, the Democratic
Party is against them? That’s a decision that helps the abortion industry, not women. But it isn’t
just abortion-industry voices like Keenan’s who were extremists at the
convention. First lady Michelle Obama also promoted abortion — in words that make Todd
Akin look like a science professor. She said President Obama “believes that
women are more than capable of making our own choices about our bodies.”
Of course, unborn children — fetuses, if you must — are separate from their
mothers. I have experienced this personally, having once been an unborn child.
I am not my mother. Even as embryos, we have our own DNA that has already
determined many characteristics about us, including our sex. But abortion businesses need that lie to maximize profits. No wonder
Democratic abortion lobbyists don’t want pregnant women to have ultrasounds:
The truth would hurt sales. But the most chilling lines were from the president’s speech. He clearly knows what makes true Democrats’ hearts beat: looking out for the
little guy. He complimented delegates: “You’re the reason there’s a little girl
with a heart disorder in Phoenix who'll get the surgery she needs because an
insurance company can’t limit her coverage. You did that.”
Really? The platform says the same health-care plan that helped that toddler
could have killed her at taxpayer expense a matter of months before. For true
Democrats, the principle that makes you want a toddler to get medical care
should forbid you to kill her before (or
immediately after) she is born. He also said: “We believe that a little girl who’s offered an escape from
poverty … could become the founder of the next Google or the scientist who
cures cancer or the president of the United States — and it’s in our power to
give her that chance.” Good point. But think about the 1.6 million abortions in America each year.
How many entrepreneurs, scientists and peacemakers end up in medical-waste
bags? True Democrats believe a little girl who is offered an escape from being
aborted will do great things, too.
But the violence isn’t just in the womb. The degree to which Democrats have
embraced war is just as scary. The option for peace needs a strong voice
outside of the Vatican and the bishops. The civilian deaths in Afghanistan
and Libya
and the redefinition of “combatant” to mean “any
military-aged male in a strike zone” are a travesty that someone in
politics should be willing to oppose. Obama’s Abu Ghraib, the “kill teams,” would have been a months-long story
under Bush, but the Democratic-majority media in America mostly ignored them (overseas
media didn’t hold back). People who clobbered Bush for much milder actions turn a blind eye
when the Democratic commander in chief bombs Libya with a no-confidence vote
from Congress, “turns
back the clock” on Guantanamo — and that doesn’t even mention everything
that has happened this week.
The time for toleration is past. Democratic voters need to step up and found
a new Democratic Party that is true to the traditions of the party earlier in
the 20th century. What to call it? Christian Democrats? That term might have too much European
baggage. Traditional Democrats? That might sound too stodgy. True Democrats? I
like that one. At any rate, true Democrats need to do something. They don’t want to be Republicans. Fine. Who can blame them? But they truly
are deserving of blame if they simply enable the abortion-war-and-anti-religion
policies of today’s Democratic Party.
The American People's Alliance
ReplyDeleteNo, straight to the next stage. Where we are now, too.
ReplyDelete