As the West Coast Main Line stands on the brink of "temporary" renationalisation by the Tories, Neil Clark writes:
The NHS — the crowning achievement of the 1945-51
Labour government — is facing destruction as a result of the coalition’s
reforms. Public libraries are being closed — in July it was reported that 150
had been closed or handed over to “volunteers” in the last 12 months and that a
further 225 were threatened. State secondary education — and the pay and
working conditions of teachers — are being undermined by the rapid spread of
“free” schools and academies. The Royal Mail is being fattened up ready for
privatisation, with record rises in stamp prices. This will hit the poor and
the elderly hardest, since they are less likely to use email. And we all know
how French transnational Atos has been commissioned to decide which disabled
people qualify for benefits, causing, according to campaigner Roger Lewis,
“huge damage and distress.”
For the neoliberals austerity is being used as an
excuse to destroy the last vestiges of the progressive and humane post-war
settlement. Last week’s reshuffle was a clear signal from PM David Cameron that
he intends to “finish the job” that Margaret Thatcher started in 1979. New Health
Secretary Jeremy Hunt — the man on texting terms with James Murdoch —
co-authored a 2005 pamphlet saying: “Our ambition should be to break down the
barriers between private and public provision, in effect denationalising the
provision of health care in Britain.” New Planning Minister Nick Boles — a
former director of pro-privatisation think tank Policy Exchange — once declared
that he wanted to scrap local government planning rules and unleash “chaotic”
effects on local communities. He has also called for pensioners to be
means-tested on benefits such as free bus travel and prescriptions.
And new Minister for Children and Families David
Laws is a former investment banker and co-editor of the pro-privatisation
Liberal Democrat Orange Book. Laws wrote this year: “The state’s direct role in
the economy should continue to decline, with the transfer of such assets such
as Royal Mail to the private sector and with further action to restrain public
expenditure.” With such men entrenched in power, how can we derail the
neoliberal drive to destroy public services?
For one thing, we need to contrast the things the
government is prepared to spend money on with things that it isn’t. It’s a good
way to expose its true agenda. A government that preaches austerity at home did
find the money to bomb Libya last year, and still does to maintain our army’s
presence in Afghanistan. It recently pledged extra millions for the
anti-government forces in Syria. And if the US president got on the phone and
asked us to help attack Iran, does anyone doubt that the money would
mysteriously be found? But while there’s always money for killing people in
countries where the government doesn’t do the West’s bidding the NHS, which
saves lives, is facing £20 billion in cuts.
It’s also worth exposing the hypocrisy of the
individuals in the elite, who call for a “smaller state” and cuts in services
for ordinary people but are happy to scrounge off the state when it suits them,
despite their wealth and high salaries. The three ministers mentioned above are
good examples. Boles has claimed £678.80 from the taxpayer for private Hebrew
lessons to help him communicate better with his Israeli partner. When
challenged about getting the public to pay for something for his own private
benefit, Boles said: “It’s something I’m entitled to do. I’ve done it and
that’s that.” He may have been trying to emulate Hunt, who has claimed over
£3,000 to learn Mandarin after marrying a Chinese woman.
As for Laws — I can do no better than to quote
John Pilger’s verdict. “Imagine someone on state benefits caught claiming
£40,000 of taxpayers’ money in a second-home scam. A prison sentence would
almost certainly follow. David Laws, [then] chief secretary to the Treasury,
does the same and is described by Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg as follows:
‘I have always admired his intelligence, his sense of public duty and his
personal integrity’.” Laws doesn’t get put on trial because he has a “brilliant
mind” and is one of the ruling elite. He went to Cambridge, worked in the City
and supports privatisation. So despite taking £40,000 from the public purse and
being condemned by the parliamentary standards and privilege committee for “a
series of serious breaches of the rules over a considerable time,” this extremely
wealthy man is back in government as if nothing has happened.
So exposing double standards is of crucial
importance. But, as Francis Prideaux has argued in this newspaper [the Morning Star], we must also push for
renationalisation at both the TUC Congress and the Labour Party conference. There
can be no long-term economic recovery, no repair of our damaged social fabric
and no narrowing of the gap between rich and poor without public ownership. Increased
public spending without public ownership might give the economy a short-term
boost but it would do nothing to solve its underlying structural problems — or
the fact that since 1979 it has been geared to the needs of the 1 per cent
alone.
A renationalised railway network could lead to a
new golden age of the train. Public money would go on reopening stations closed
since the Beeching axe, providing new trains and carriages and creating
thousands of jobs, instead of going as at present to the wealthy shareholders
and the owners of the privateer train operators. A renationalised bus industry
and a nationwide reduction of fares to the European average would reverse the
dramatic fall in bus use since privatisation in the 1980s and help ease
congestion on the roads. Renationalisation of energy and gas would mean lower
bills for consumers and small businesses, making a big difference to the
budgets of households and firms. A renationalised water industry in England
would lead to lower bills — and would also enable the construction of a
much-needed national water grid to transport water from wetter to drier areas.
There are so many exciting, positive things which
could be achieved with public ownership. It’s heartbreaking to think of the
waste of resources we currently have to put up with. The first big challenge is
to get Labour to sign up to the renationalisation programme. Renationalising
the railways is already conference policy but up to now the leadership have
ignored it. The party seemed to edge in the right direction earlier this summer
when it said nothing would be ruled out in its policy review — but the
pro-privatisation Blairites are still strong — shadow transport secretary Maria
Eagle appeared to rule out any return to British Rail in a recent interview
with Progress.
If the Labour
hierarchy doesn’t change tack and listen to its own conference, the Labour
Representation Committee and the majority of the British public we will end by
having to vote for parties that do support renationalisation. For all the fancy
talk of a “new politics” or “a capitalism that works for the people” a Labour
government with no commitment to public ownership would only continue Britain’s
neoliberal nightmare.
No comments:
Post a Comment