Michele Bachmann is now an even more likely Presidential candidate than Sarah Palin. This is glorious news.
Democrats should still seek to reach out, for its own sake, to those who would otherwise be attracted to Sarah Palin, with her admirable history as a Buchananite battler for job protection, war aversion, immigration control and family values against the archenemy of all of them, the global “free” market, and with her record of publicly administered natural resources held in common ownership.
Likewise, Democrats should still seek to reach out, for its own sake, to those who would otherwise be attracted to Mitt Romney, the prophet and apostle of socialised medicine, who ran for the Senate from the left of Ted Kennedy.
Democrats should still seek to reach out, for its own sake, to those who would otherwise be attracted to Mike Huckabee, economically one of the most left-wing governors in American history, and against abortion and same-sex “marriage” while in favour of Second Amendment rights.
And Democrats should still seek to reach out, for its own sake, to those who would otherwise be attracted to Ron Paul, with his opposition to bailouts, wars, and the erosion of constitutional checks and balances.
However, there should be no difficulty in defeating Michele Bachmann, since white Catholics have decided every Presidential Election since 1976, whereas Bachmann’s Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod teaches that the Papacy is the Antichrist. Quite what Luther would have made of her Christian Zionism is altogether another question. Though not one that we should refrain from asking.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Is it true that you wrote to hundreds of journalists under the name "Stephen Alexander" pretending to be someone else?
ReplyDeleteNo, of course not. I am not sure that I even know "hundreds of journalists". Why would anyone? There are nowhere near that many worth knowing. I suppose that I know about a hundred, but Hotmail won't let me send that many emails at once.
ReplyDeleteNow, on topic, please.
So why does everyone think you did? You have got a record of sock puppets, haven't you?
ReplyDeleteNo. And the answer to your first question is "Because Oliver Kamm is a liar", but that is hardly news. He is a liar with a history of being investigated by the Police for his criminal harassment of Neil Clark, who is certainly having the last, longest and loudest laugh now.
ReplyDeletePeople who repeat his malicious falsehoods also have a history of being investigated by the Police and others for all manner of things, I am told...
I am not putting up anything else off topic.
But on Ed West's blog you're being taken apart for your sock puppetry.
ReplyDeleteAll lies, put about a genocidal maniac who eats Iraqi babies. And I don't just mean Damian Thompson, who probably insists that those babies be Catholics.
ReplyDeleteThis thread is closed.
So why does Durham universally regard you as a fraud?
ReplyDeleteWho, the achingly senior figure who told me, "as if I need to tell you", to ignore everything ever written in some student rag? The people who have since elected me unopposed as President of a Senior Common Room and a member of a College Council?
ReplyDeleteOr do you mean the schoolboy sewers of Kammite filth, people whose own conduct, shall we say, would not bear too much investigation, but has nevertheless been subject to it...? They don't want to push their luck a second time, do they? I mean, they are thick. They are only where they are because there are no grammar schools. But even so...
This thread really is closed now.
But you were exposed for having the same IP address as a sock puppet, weren't you? Is that why you have this reputation at Durham?
ReplyDeleteNo. And it should be perfectly obvious that, among anyone who really matters, I don't.
ReplyDeleteEven anyone who has ever won the Presidency of the Junior Common Room at my college, rather than having been disqualified from the election for being a crook.
Now clear off. This site is not for the likes of you. It is for your betters.