Tuesday 4 January 2011

Principalities and Powers

From time to time, I receive a good number of emails from people in Wales who want to convey their delight that anyone in the wider United Kingdom has noticed their plight at the hands of that very particular oligarchy which has long existed in some form, but which has been given the run of the place by devolution.

Based in English-speaking areas, but using the Welsh language as its cordon sanitaire, that oligarchy is equally hostile and damaging to the general populations of English-speaking and Welsh-speaking areas alike. From some of the latter, I have actually had communications from people who, apparently based on my prose style, have assumed that I could read Welsh, a deficiency which is of course on my part, and which one day, together with the want of my ancestors' Gaelic, I may remedy.

But now, that oligarchy is embarked upon yet another power grab, aided and abetted by the express indifference of a Prime Minister whose attitude is inexplicable on many levels. A classic posh Scot in that his country house there is matched by a grand London townhouse, an English public school education, an Oxbridge degree, and a safe Conservative seat in the South East of England, he would never dream of adopting such an approach to Scotland. Yet his party has long done better in Wales, where it has mostly been a victim of First Past The Post, than in Scotland, and it has lately done very well indeed there.

With no economic mythology based around a single natural resource, Wales has no separatists worth speaking of, and never has had, not even when this island had the sense to dig the coal on which it largely stands. For the sheer lack of anything else, such people as do exist vote Plaid Cymru, a party not without more admirable features as an embodiment, both of the rural Radicalism that largely died of neglect in England after the First World War, and of the Welsh peace tradition such that that party has from the outset opposed the war in Afghanistan. However, resurgent Welsh Toryism does face a serious threat from UKIP, which, unlike the Liberal Democrats, is strong enough in Wales to have returned an MEP there.

One could go on.

Yet Cameron is determined to hold a referendum on further Welsh devolution, wanted by no one except the members of the Assembly and of their entourages. Created with the support of fully twenty-six per cent of eligible voters, the Assembly has already given the land of Bevan, as staunch a Unionist as it is possible to imagine, longer waits than in England for elective surgery, a forty-six per cent (in some areas, a seventeen per cent) ambulance response time to Category A emergencies compared with England's seventy-seven per cent, the worst stroke services in the United Kingdom, and the endangerment of cross-border services because of a refusal to work with English Health Trusts.

More broadly, investment per pupil is now 9.5% lower than in England, there is a worsening lack of local access to A-level courses, seventy million pounds recently had to be sent back to Brussels because it had not been spent on time, there is a sixty million pound shortfall in university funding, and even Professor Kevin Morgan, who chaired the Yes campaign in 1997, now speaks of devolution as "devolving our way to relative economic decline".

None of this would be helped by primary legislative powers for the body that has created the mess. Still less by taxing and borrowing powers for that same body, necessarily as part of a funding reorganisation that would leave it with £9.1 billion to find by one or both of those means. Unless, that is, it intended to abolish the whole of health spending and local government. There is a proposal for a Welsh Stock Market, but, as much as anything else, why would anywhere want such a thing these days? A Welsh Honours List is a faintly charming, and reassuringly monarchist, idea, but the main argument against it is that it seeks to solve a problem which does not exist: Wales, with about five per cent of the United Kingdom's population, already receives about six per cent of honours. Good on the Welsh.

That leaves the rumbling about a separate judicial system. Lots of extra money, largely public money, for lawyers, mostly or entirely South Wales-based but bilingual lawyers deliberately as detached from the life of an English-speaking former pit village as from the life of a Welsh-speaking agricultural community. Extreme inconvenience in securing justice from the higher courts if one happened to live in North, Mid or West Wales and had to make the time-consuming journey to Cardiff, via exactly the English cities where one's case could previously have been heard.

But very difficult, if not impossible, to avoid if the Welsh Assembly is given primary legislative powers, even with a safeguard such as the need for approval by both Houses of Parliament, following a recommendation as to expediency or otherwise by the Welsh Affairs Select Committee, before proceeding to Royal Assent, in the same way that Measures passed by the General Synod of the Church of England require such approval, following a recommendation as to expediency or otherwise by the Ecclesiastical Committee, before proceeding to Royal Assent.

Furthermore, the majority of those MPs voting in favour should have to include the majority of those sitting for Welsh seats; they, along with the (often very Old Labour) Welsh Peers who could be relied upon to turn out in force on these occasions and to exercise that great sway which is the manner of the House of Lords when true experts speak, would spare both English-speaking and Welsh-speaking Wales many a monstrosity that would doubtless be imposed without such checks and balances.

Why is David Cameron indulging this clamour for one moment? Why? And how does he regard it as remotely consistent with his position, even if not a single person in Wales voted for his party, to be indifferent as to the answer or the outcome?

10 comments:

  1. Both surviving members of the Gang of Six are now in the Lords, along with numerous other Labour veterans of No campaigns past. And that is only when we consider the Labour benches.

    Down the corridor are still a few of the old South Wales traditionalists, with no desire for further devolution even if they are reconciled to what there already is. The only Welsh Tories truly in favour of devolution are in the Assembly, not in the Commons. Oddly enough, Lembit is a loss, since the traditional Liberal areas of Wales recorded quite high No votes to devolution and it has done nothing to change their minds.

    And it is true, you do write like a Celt. In the genes, I suppose.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Your idea about primary legislation needing parliamentary approval is brilliant. What the further devolutionists, whom you describe perfectly, fear is not scrutiny by Westminster parliamentarians who are English. What they fear is scrutiny by Westminster parliamentarians who are Welsh.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Why do you keep claiming that Cameron is a "posh Scot". He had a Scottish father. End of. They do not even speak of him as Scottish here whilst there was a debate about Blair - and then decided he was an embaressment and forgot about him.

    You keep harping on about Jura. He does not own a house on Jura. His stepfather does and this will probably pass to his half-silbings in-laws.

    To be honest the other half-Scottish Conservative David on the block is more readily described as a Scot. David McAllister, Minister-President of Lower Saxony is openly called "Scottish" due to his frequent holidays here, speaking English with a Scottish accent, drinking Irn-Bru, wearing a kilt regularly and proposing to his wife on the banks of Loch Ness. All very caledonian.

    Of course as the civic and political head of what was mostly formerly the Kingdom of Hanover, the land who gave us our esteemed dynasty, I suppose since he is the nearest Hanover has to a king/elector these days and Hanover has Salic law, that makes him the Queen's overlord. Will she grovel before a former German army officer at Hanover?

    By the way, Joanna Lumley has three Scots grandparents and has a house in Dumfrieshire. Does that make her a posh Scot? And the half-Scottish Hugh Grant?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Oh, come on, he even has the country house there. He's a classic example of the type. And would no doubt say so, if asked directly.

    If there really is "no debate" on the question in Scotland (there is less and less in England, but in the opposite direction; next may yet be that Osborne is Irish, and might even say that he was if asked), then that can only be attributed to the very recent definition of Scottishness strictly in terms of the industrial working class or the very poor, to the exclusion of all others.

    And where does that leave you, Don Roberto?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Definition of "Scottishness" is fluid. For example Sir Rio Stakis was treated as an honoary Scot and his children as Scottish.

    On the other hand Lord Charles Forte was not really treated as "Scozzia-Italia" and Sir Rocco is definately not classed as Scottish.

    Cameron does not own any property on Jura. End of. He holidays there at his step dad-in-law's.

    You still have know idea who Don Roberto was do you? Think of Pampas.

    ReplyDelete
  6. And however fluid it is, it certainly washes Cameron, at least in part. Ask him, I expect.

    On the other side, where people normally emphasise his distant relationship to the Queen, he is largely Welshified Jewish. Sephardic, so presumably not related to Michael Howard. But you never know.

    ReplyDelete
  7. "Yet Cameron is determined to hold a referendum on further Welsh devolution, wanted by no one except the members of the Assembly and of their entourages."

    And 57% of the Welsh public according to latest polls - but then you wouldn't mention that would you? Seeing as how it goes against your own personal view?

    Same as you wouldn't mention the fact that the Assembly has kept University fees down, given everyone free prescriptions, the elderly free bus passes.

    Oh and about this alleged £70m sent back to Brussles because it was not spent on time - you just made that up right now didn't you!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Not at all. Look out for it to feature prominently in the No campaign.

    ReplyDelete
  9. If True Wales (assumed to be the de facto No campaign) ever mentions it I assume they will be knocked down straight away since it never happened.

    But then they might as well still say it, they haven't stuck very close to the "True" part of their name so far.

    ReplyDelete
  10. It's certainly on their website. Among other places.

    ReplyDelete