Saturday, 1 December 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Political prisoner, activist, journalist, hymn-writer, emerging thinktanker, aspiring novelist, "tribal elder", 2019 parliamentary candidate for North West Durham, Shadow Leader of the Opposition, "Speedboat", "The Cockroach", eagerly awaiting the second (or possibly third) attempt to murder me.
What about poor black women in the developing world who do indeed abstain from extramarital sexual activity but whose husbands, unknown to them, use prostitutes?
ReplyDeleteI'd have thought they were quite a good example of people who are highly vulnerable to HIV infection and who would benefit from better access to contraception.
(This doesn't just apply to "poor black women", of course.)
Men shouldn't go with prostitutes. And women shouldn't be them. Again, who, exactly, is incapable of observing these injunctions? And why, exactly?
ReplyDeleteNo, David, I'm talking about married women whose husbands, without their knowledge, use prostitutes. In other words, people who completely observe the injunctions you give, and still get infected with HIV.
ReplyDeleteWell, then, he wouldn't wear a condom anyway. And she wouldn't know to tell him to.
ReplyDelete