Daniel Larison writes:
Eight years after the start of the U.S.-led military
intervention to overthrow Moammar Gaddafi and promote “stability,” Libya is
still wracked by civil war.
Ironically, the violence over the next few days has
forced the U.S. to evacuate its remaining forces—there for diplomatic security
and counterterrorism—from the volatile country.
Ever since the collapse of the old regime and
Gaddafi’s violent death in 2011, Libya has been split among rival militias, and
since 2014 it has had two would-be national governments.
The government based
in Tripoli now enjoys international recognition and some Western support, while
the government in the eastern Libyan city of Tobruk has benefited from the
support of Egypt, the Saudis, and the United Arab Emirates.
The leader of the Tobruk government’s forces,
Khalifa Haftar, is a former exile (at one point in the U.S., reportedly backed by, and maintaining ties to the CIA) who returned to Libya during the 2011 war and served as the head of the new
army under the first post-Gaddafi government.
Haftar broke with them in 2014,
and he has been engaged in a fight to take control of eastern Libya and to
oppose the government in Tripoli ever since.
Over the last few months, his
forces have seized the oil fields in the south
of the country.
Libya’s long-running civil war escalated sharply in the last
week as Haftar launched a surprise offensive against Tripoli in an attempt to
seize the national capital.
His aggressive move has been met with widespread
condemnation, from the U.N., the U.S., and the EU, and it has driven the rival
western militias to band together in opposition to him.
Borzou Daragahi reported on the fighting earlier this
week:
A military offensive by a Libyan warlord against the
country’s capital has done what years of negotiations and talks have failed to
do – unite the country’s powerful western militias in an all-out effort to defend
Tripoli.
Already at least 41 people have been killed and dozens
more injured in clashes inside and outside of the capital, as the UN and EU
struggled to put an end to the conflict that has pitted the country’s two main
armed alliances against each other for control of the city of 1.2 million.
A “national conference” had been scheduled to
take place next week to try to negotiate a political settlement, but Haftar’s
abrupt decision to assault the capital has put an end to that for the
foreseeable future.
Libya has been unstable and chaotic since the U.S.-led regime change effort collapsed the old government and left the country’s many militias vying for power, but conditions have lately grown even worse.
Foreign powers have been treating Libya as their playground for the last eight years, and with Haftar’s offensive, we can see evidence of the increasingly baleful regional influence of his Egyptian, Saudi, and Emirati patrons.
Haftar met with Saudi King Salman in Riyadh on March 27, and both the Saudi and Egyptian governments appear to have given him their blessing for this attack.
As Tarek Megerisi put it in a recent article on Haftar and the civil war: “Haftar’s ascension has been driven by foreign powers whose understanding of Libya is skewed and whose interests are at odds with that of the Libyan population and many states dependent on Libya’s stability.”
Security conditions in the country have deteriorated so quickly over the last few weeks that American forces based in western Libya were evacuated at the start of the week.
The U.S. is currently fighting one of its many unauthorized wars in Libya, and it has cooperated with the Tripoli government against the local ISIS affiliate for the last several years. The U.S. has so far not joined the fighting against Haftar’s forces.
The Trump administration has publicly criticized the new offensive and called on Haftar to halt the attack, but it is doubtful that the U.S. will do anything more than that.
Libya has been unstable and chaotic since the U.S.-led regime change effort collapsed the old government and left the country’s many militias vying for power, but conditions have lately grown even worse.
Foreign powers have been treating Libya as their playground for the last eight years, and with Haftar’s offensive, we can see evidence of the increasingly baleful regional influence of his Egyptian, Saudi, and Emirati patrons.
Haftar met with Saudi King Salman in Riyadh on March 27, and both the Saudi and Egyptian governments appear to have given him their blessing for this attack.
As Tarek Megerisi put it in a recent article on Haftar and the civil war: “Haftar’s ascension has been driven by foreign powers whose understanding of Libya is skewed and whose interests are at odds with that of the Libyan population and many states dependent on Libya’s stability.”
Security conditions in the country have deteriorated so quickly over the last few weeks that American forces based in western Libya were evacuated at the start of the week.
The U.S. is currently fighting one of its many unauthorized wars in Libya, and it has cooperated with the Tripoli government against the local ISIS affiliate for the last several years. The U.S. has so far not joined the fighting against Haftar’s forces.
The Trump administration has publicly criticized the new offensive and called on Haftar to halt the attack, but it is doubtful that the U.S. will do anything more than that.
By mobilizing
and uniting most forces in western Libya against him, Haftar’s attack on
Tripoli has totally transformed the balance of forces in Libya.
He wanted to grab it all; now he faces the real possibility that he might lose most (even all) of what he had before the attack.
He wanted to grab it all; now he faces the real possibility that he might lose most (even all) of what he had before the attack.
Whatever the outcome of the latest battle, the continuation of the war is certain to deepen the misery of Libya’s civilian population.
Eight years later, Libya is still living with the instability and violence that resulted from U.S.-backed regime change made possible by Western intervention.
Like many other such interventions, the Libyan war has left behind a legacy of upheaval and destruction.
The civilians that supposedly benefited will be living with the consequences for years and probably decades to come.
No comments:
Post a Comment