Add the absence of an arrest of Amber Rudd for contempt of court to the absence of arrests over Grenfell Tower. Or over Orgeave. Or over Hillsborough until Margaret Thatcher was dead, undoubtedly an act of policy. Or under the law against cannabis. Or under the law against foxhunting, to which the Police act as escorts, arresting only anyone who might seek to obstruct this criminality or to object to it.
Or of anyone other than a Premier League footballer, and even then probably only one from the "wrong" club, for the "digital penetration" of a 15-year-old girl who had, furthermore, been out drinking with the complete impunity of everyone from her parents to the relevant licensees. Or of anyone other than a minister of religion, or possibly a teacher, for any kind of sexual activity with a 15-year-old boy.
Or of the people who openly admitted to having filled in their 2015 General Election forms incorrectly in such numbers as to have affected the overall result, a crime that is not affected by the fact that there has been another General Election since they committed it. Or of Tony Blair for selling peerages, which he did by every means short of advertising them in Exchange and Mart. Or of Tony Blair and his accomplices as the war criminals that they so obviously are. Or of George Osborne and his accomplices over their larceny of the Royal Mail. Or of George Osborne for his violent remarks about Theresa May.
Consider these things if and when any attempt is made to prosecute anyone in relation to the upcoming strikes over public sector pay. And consider them as I prepare for my case management hearing on Friday 13th October. When is Amber Rudd's case management hearing? There is evidence against her. Whereas there is literally none against me, even though on that date I shall have been charged for five months and arrested for six.
I could only be convicted by a corrupted jury, and since there is not going to be a corrupted jury, then it is absolutely impossible for me to be convicted. Therefore, this whole business is, as much as anything else, a scandalous waste of public money.
Or of anyone other than a Premier League footballer, and even then probably only one from the "wrong" club, for the "digital penetration" of a 15-year-old girl who had, furthermore, been out drinking with the complete impunity of everyone from her parents to the relevant licensees. Or of anyone other than a minister of religion, or possibly a teacher, for any kind of sexual activity with a 15-year-old boy.
Or of the people who openly admitted to having filled in their 2015 General Election forms incorrectly in such numbers as to have affected the overall result, a crime that is not affected by the fact that there has been another General Election since they committed it. Or of Tony Blair for selling peerages, which he did by every means short of advertising them in Exchange and Mart. Or of Tony Blair and his accomplices as the war criminals that they so obviously are. Or of George Osborne and his accomplices over their larceny of the Royal Mail. Or of George Osborne for his violent remarks about Theresa May.
Consider these things if and when any attempt is made to prosecute anyone in relation to the upcoming strikes over public sector pay. And consider them as I prepare for my case management hearing on Friday 13th October. When is Amber Rudd's case management hearing? There is evidence against her. Whereas there is literally none against me, even though on that date I shall have been charged for five months and arrested for six.
I could only be convicted by a corrupted jury, and since there is not going to be a corrupted jury, then it is absolutely impossible for me to be convicted. Therefore, this whole business is, as much as anything else, a scandalous waste of public money.
No comments:
Post a Comment