We’re all
used to the idea of the National Minimum Wage.
This policy, introduced by the last Labour Government and voted as the best of last 30 years by the Political Studies Association, ensured no one went unrewarded for hard work.
Yet, a minimum wage can only go so far if corporate salaries continue to escalate as they are doing.
We are now living in a world where the bosses of Britain’s biggest companies had already made more money in 2015 by January 6th, than most workers in the country will earn in the entire year.
Indeed, CEOs are now receiving twice as much total remuneration as they were a decade ago.
Are they working twice as hard? Or are they just twice as important as the rest of us?
The official justification is that such salaries are necessary, to attract the best and as a reward for their hard graft.
But the reality is executive pay has become a kind of racket, with a small club of non-executives voting themselves huge rises and ignoring their shareholders
The FTSE has barely moved a notch over the last 10 years.
In other cases top businessmen receive gargantuan payoffs after they have brought a company to its knees.
So the very idea of extreme performance related pay is ridiculous.
Most of the teachers, doctors and workers across the country don’t expect multi-million pound bonuses just for working hard.
However, not only is this farcical, it is actively harmful.
Extreme disparities are bad for businesses, encouraging risk taking whilst also increasing resentment in the workforce.
It is also bad for the social fabric of our country. Income inequality is a big and growing problem.
The IMF has said countries with bigger disparities see their economy more frequently plunged into deeper recessions, while economic growth lasts much longer in more equal societies
That’s why I led a debate on Tuesday calling for a Maximum Wage.
Through legislation or tax incentives, we could make companies pay their CEO’s no more than 100 times the average salary of non-boardroom staff.
The naysayers will say this is anti-business, and unachievable. But plenty of other countries have similar policies.
Take the move to cap bankers’ bonuses a few years ago.
The rest of Europe banked this justifiable and necessary move, finding it unthinkable that after all the banks had done wrong in causing the crisis, those at the top could still receive lavish remuneration.
It was George Osborne who took exception, making a failed attempt to label the move “illegal.”
Since launching my maximum wage campaign earlier this week, I’ve been contacted by people in countries such as Switzerland and the US showing their support.
It was in Switzerland that the idea took root a few years ago. People voted on a maximum wage no more than 12 times higher the lowest wage.
It was rejected, but the Swiss were at least given a choice on the matter.
In the US, Rhode Island passed a bill that would give corporations with a top-bottom pay ratio under 32-to-1 preferential treatment in state government contract bidding.
In California, a majority of state senators backed legislation that would subject corporations with excessive pay ratios to a higher corporate income tax rate.
If a country based on free market ideals such as the USA can encourage lower top to bottom pay ratios, it can almost certainly be done here.
There already exist forward looking companies that enforce top to bottom pay ratios.
Big British businesses like John Lewis cap exec pay at 75 times the average salary in the company, while bank TSB don’t pay their CEO any more than 65 times the wages of their frontline employee.
This isn’t about taking money from people. On the contrary, it’s about raising standards for everybody.
If a CEO wanted a pay rise, he would have to ensure the average worker’s salary increased too.
With pay ratios, money would be distributed more equitably throughout a company while still ensuring those at the top receive decent remuneration.
We could bring this situation about by following America’s example, offering government contracts to those companies with the lowest top to bottom pay ratios, and encouraging less extreme salaries through tax incentives.
A maximum wage would ensure that in a time of growing income disparity, we all mind the gap.
Sign the petition here.
This policy, introduced by the last Labour Government and voted as the best of last 30 years by the Political Studies Association, ensured no one went unrewarded for hard work.
Yet, a minimum wage can only go so far if corporate salaries continue to escalate as they are doing.
We are now living in a world where the bosses of Britain’s biggest companies had already made more money in 2015 by January 6th, than most workers in the country will earn in the entire year.
Indeed, CEOs are now receiving twice as much total remuneration as they were a decade ago.
Are they working twice as hard? Or are they just twice as important as the rest of us?
The official justification is that such salaries are necessary, to attract the best and as a reward for their hard graft.
But the reality is executive pay has become a kind of racket, with a small club of non-executives voting themselves huge rises and ignoring their shareholders
The FTSE has barely moved a notch over the last 10 years.
In other cases top businessmen receive gargantuan payoffs after they have brought a company to its knees.
So the very idea of extreme performance related pay is ridiculous.
Most of the teachers, doctors and workers across the country don’t expect multi-million pound bonuses just for working hard.
However, not only is this farcical, it is actively harmful.
Extreme disparities are bad for businesses, encouraging risk taking whilst also increasing resentment in the workforce.
It is also bad for the social fabric of our country. Income inequality is a big and growing problem.
The IMF has said countries with bigger disparities see their economy more frequently plunged into deeper recessions, while economic growth lasts much longer in more equal societies
That’s why I led a debate on Tuesday calling for a Maximum Wage.
Through legislation or tax incentives, we could make companies pay their CEO’s no more than 100 times the average salary of non-boardroom staff.
The naysayers will say this is anti-business, and unachievable. But plenty of other countries have similar policies.
Take the move to cap bankers’ bonuses a few years ago.
The rest of Europe banked this justifiable and necessary move, finding it unthinkable that after all the banks had done wrong in causing the crisis, those at the top could still receive lavish remuneration.
It was George Osborne who took exception, making a failed attempt to label the move “illegal.”
Since launching my maximum wage campaign earlier this week, I’ve been contacted by people in countries such as Switzerland and the US showing their support.
It was in Switzerland that the idea took root a few years ago. People voted on a maximum wage no more than 12 times higher the lowest wage.
It was rejected, but the Swiss were at least given a choice on the matter.
In the US, Rhode Island passed a bill that would give corporations with a top-bottom pay ratio under 32-to-1 preferential treatment in state government contract bidding.
In California, a majority of state senators backed legislation that would subject corporations with excessive pay ratios to a higher corporate income tax rate.
If a country based on free market ideals such as the USA can encourage lower top to bottom pay ratios, it can almost certainly be done here.
There already exist forward looking companies that enforce top to bottom pay ratios.
Big British businesses like John Lewis cap exec pay at 75 times the average salary in the company, while bank TSB don’t pay their CEO any more than 65 times the wages of their frontline employee.
This isn’t about taking money from people. On the contrary, it’s about raising standards for everybody.
If a CEO wanted a pay rise, he would have to ensure the average worker’s salary increased too.
With pay ratios, money would be distributed more equitably throughout a company while still ensuring those at the top receive decent remuneration.
We could bring this situation about by following America’s example, offering government contracts to those companies with the lowest top to bottom pay ratios, and encouraging less extreme salaries through tax incentives.
A maximum wage would ensure that in a time of growing income disparity, we all mind the gap.
Sign the petition here.
Held the line for traditional marriage, sacked as a PPS for voting against the bombing of Iraq, signed up to the One Nation Society, voted against three-parent babies, and now this.
ReplyDeleteSacked as PPS to the Shadow Secretary of State for Defence, no less.
Delete