Nick Dearden writes:
On Friday
12 September, Vince Cable has the chance to preserve a remnant of our democracy
from the clutches of big business. Unfortunately, there’s little sign he will
take this opportunity.
In an obscure European Union committee, representatives of
the different European countries will approve the text of a ‘free trade’ deal
between the EU and Canada.
If it weren’t for a series of leaks, very few Europeans
would have seen this treaty – and the vast majority of MPs and MEPs still don’t
formally have access to the text.
Despite the lack of democratic debate, this week is the
last chance our government has to amend the treaty before it is signed off at a
Canada-EU Summit on 25 September.
At the heart of the EU-Canada deal is a mechanism which
would allow Canadian companies to sue the British government for damaging their
bottom line, completely bypassing the British legal system in the process.
The infamous Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS)
mechanism already exists in many treaties between other countries.
It has been
used by companies to sue governments for reversing the privatisation of health
insurance, introducing a minimum wage, putting health warnings on cigarette
packets and freezing energy prices.
Such cases always come before a special tribunal populated
with corporate lawyers rather than being heard within the regular court system,
and are rarely open to appeal.
The World
Development Movement and
the many other campaign groups and trade unions fighting against ‘free trade’
deals believe these ‘corporate courts’ are a direct affront to democracy.
They
place the ‘right to make profit’ ahead of any concern for human rights or the
environment.
They are a direct threat, for instance, to any future
British government’s willingness to fully renationalise the NHS, to regulate
energy prices, to take back control of the railways, or to ban fracking.
So controversial are these parallel legal systems that the
EU was forced to open a public consultation on their use earlier in the year.
It received a record-breaking 150,000 submissions.
The European Commission
claims it does not have the time to analyse these submissions until November.
Yet the EU is pushing through the EU-Canada deal this month.
Given that the largest number of individual submissions to
the consultation came from the UK, you might expect Vince Cable to demand the
removal of ISDS from the EU-Canada deal.
He can do so this week if he chooses.
You might expect at the very least that he would delay the ratification
process.
It seems unlikely.
Throughout the negotiations on the EU-US
trade deal (TTIP) and the EU-Canada trade deal (CETA), the British government
has firmly supported the creation of more of these corporate courts – even
though its own research has shown that
including this system in
the treaties would be a mistake for Britain.
If EU states like Britain do not speak out against
corporate courts this week, they will be embedded in the EU-Canada deal.
Neither the European parliament nor the British parliament will have the
ability to amend a treaty which they had no role in negotiating.
In fact, the treaty is likely to come into effect before the British parliament even has the chance
to see the agreement.
There is no obligation for parliament to debate, let
alone scrutinise, the agreement.
A multinational company based in Canada (or a
US company with a Canadian subsidiary) could then successfully sue the British
government before parliament has even had the chance to look at the deal.
There is much else that should concern us in CETA.
It will
lock in private control of public services, it will limit the use of public
buying power as a means of stimulating local, environmentally sound economies,
and it will further erode our government’s ability to regulate the banks.
That’s why CETA has been called a ‘Trojan horse’ for
corporate power.
Under the pretence of ‘more growth, more jobs’, our democracy
is being dismantled. The ability of future governments to create a more
progressive society is being eroded.
Neither the Labour Party nor the Socialists and Democrats
group in the European parliament are keen on these corporate mechanisms.
As a
matter of urgency, we need that disquiet to translate into all out opposition.
No comments:
Post a Comment