Matt K. Lewis writes:
Anti-tax
activist Grover Norquist argues that libertarians own the future.
In his
column, Norquist highlights "the once-impossible political shifts that
have taken place over the past 30 years" and observes that the
"relevant dividing line" is no longer "right versus left or
Republican versus Democrat but the expansion of individual liberty versus whatever
and whosoever stands in the way."
As
evidence of these political shifts on individual liberty issues, Norquist cites
homeschooling, gay marriage, defense of the second amendment, and marijuana
legalization — all formerly controversial topics that have gone mainstream relatively
recently. He makes a compelling case.
Now, it's
important to note that Norquist isn't touting a move toward uppercase
Libertarianism, but rather, lowercase libertarianism.
It's not
that people are consciously identifying as Libertarians. The
Libertarian Party will remain as hopeless as ever.
Instead,
the idea is that the major political parties have essentially co-opted
libertarian-friendly positions, which is a win for the philosophy.
As Nate Silver noted a few years ago, "There have been
visible shifts in public opinion on a number of issues, ranging from increasing
tolerance for same-sex marriage andmarijuana legalization on
the one hand, to the skepticism over stimulus packages and the health-care
overhaul on the other hand, that can be interpreted as a move toward more libertarian
views."
At first
blush, this sounds like a positive development for the right.
If it's
true that the nation hasn't gotten more liberal, just more libertarian, my fellow conservatives and I ought to
celebrate, right? Wrong.
Conservatism
and libertarianism are not the same.
There are
obvious differences on hot-button issues like military intervention
(libertarians tend to oppose it while many conservatives tend to favor a robust
U.S. military) and immigration reform (libertarians want borders that are a
whole lot more open than what conservatives prefer).
And
there's also the ever-present tension between freedom and virtue, between order
and liberty.
Libertarians
are full steam in favor of individual-liberty issues like gay marriage and
marijuana decriminalization.
And while
not every conservative thinks these things will be the downfall of Western
civilization, we do worry that emphasizing rights over responsibility and
radical individualism over community might have unintended consequences.
As I
wrote at Politics Daily in
2011 (desktop only),
Traditional conservatives believe the rise and success of
Western society was not merely a lucky accident...but rather the product of
diligent work, trial and error, and human experience — and in many ways the
result of Christian civilization.
...Benjamin Wiker, an author and Catholic ethicist,
asserts that "libertarianism is parasitic upon Christian
civilization." He means that libertarians take for granted the social
order of our current society but ignore the moral foundations of that social
order. This order is the product of the accumulated moral wisdom of society — a
bond that is not immune to being destroyed when we become unmoored from these
traditional values.
Many
conservatives derive their political ideology from their faith. That can make it
tricky to quickly articulate.
Many
liberals and libertarians, on the other hand, can explain any position based on
a few words, such as "equality" and "freedom."
It is
dramatically more difficult to explain unintended consequences — to warn that
slowly chipping away at our nation's moral foundation might, over the course of
years or even centuries, undermine freedom and
equality in the long run.
We're all
fighting for as much equality and freedom as we can safely preserve. We just
disagree about how much is too much.
As
historian Christopher Lasch noted, to some degree, "liberal
democracy has lived off the borrowed capital of moral and religious traditions
antedating the rise of liberalism."
The same
applies to today's libertarian ethos. And the question is this: How long can we
continue?
The
answer is most definitely not forever.
No comments:
Post a Comment