Nick Thomas-Symonds writes:
In some ways, Tom Williams was an unlikely hero
of British agricultural workers. After all, as a coal miner, he was associated
with heavy industry before entering parliament for the Don Valley seat in 1922.
As a cabinet minister, however, he made his name at agriculture, a post he held
throughout the period of Clement Attlee’s Labour government from 1945 to 1951.
Williams’ flagship piece of legislation was the
1947 Agriculture Act. The first section was clear in its objectives: ‘The
following provisions of this Part of this Act shall have effect for the purpose
of promoting and maintaining, by the provision of guaranteed prices and assured
markets for the produce mentioned in the First Schedule to this Act, a stable
and efficient agricultural industry capable of producing such part of the
nation’s food and other agricultural produce as in the national interest it is
desirable to produce in the United Kingdom, and of producing it at minimum
prices consistently with proper remuneration and living conditions for farmers
and workers in agriculture and an adequate return on capital invested in the
industry.’
The twin aims are laudable. On the one hand,
Williams sought to produce a sustainable business in agriculture, but, on the
other, to ensure that those who worked in the industry were able to do so in
good conditions. Williams then created the Agricultural Wages Board in 1948,
which not only protected wage levels, but also ensured that workers were
provided with accommodation. Thus, in the postwar era, it was a Labour
government that sought to create a fairer society in rural areas, not the
Conservatives.
Indeed, in the modern day, the
Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition government wants to abolish the
Agricultural Wages Board as part of the enterprise and regulatory reform bill.
The Tory environment secretary Owen Paterson dismissed Williams’ creation as:
‘the last throwback to an era where these councils did a worthy job’. But the
Agricultural Wages Board is not some sort of historic relic. It still sets wage
levels for over 150,000 workers.
Shadow environment secretary Mary Creagh
accurately summed up the problem: ‘We don’t want to see either a race to the
bottom on wages or a great increase in the amount employers charge workers for
their tied accommodation …’ She added: ‘It means lower wages for farm workers,
and a hit to the countryside’s economy of £260m out of village high streets
over 10 years. The Tories and Lib Dems are creating a race to the bottom in
rural wages, hitting living standards and increasing social deprivation. We in
the Labour party believe that the people who grow and pick our fruit should
also be able to afford to buy it in the shops. We a need a One Nation plan for
the countryside to tackle the rural cost of living crisis, protect buses and
public services, and invest in rural jobs and growth.’
If this bill receives royal assent and is
implemented, the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats will have forfeited any
claim to speak for farm workers. Not content with squeezing living standards,
the coalition government is allowing wages to be driven down, and in doing so
seeking to reverse gains made by working people over 50 years ago.
No comments:
Post a Comment