Final Salary

So, will John Hutton be giving up his own ministerial and parliamentary pensions?

Those crowing today need to ask themselves why they are so happy to see an erstwhile Blairite Minister seeking to implement a Blairite policy. Remember that Cameron's Cabinet, if he had won outright, was to have included Peter Mandelson, Andrew Adonis and James Purnell. It effectively does contain Hutton, doing this, and Blair himself, as the Other Foreign Secretary.

Did you notice that the announcement of a pay cut for the Police was made on the very day that, by happy coincidence, Andrew Neil's guest was Lord Levy? The Political Class is having its revenge there. And elsewhere.

Peter Wilby, who would make a superb Independent National Director of Sky News (I can think of several others), writes:

The report on public-sector pensions from the former Labour minister John (now Lord) Hutton must be understood as part of a wider agenda.

First, after private-sector recklessness, greed and incompetence plunged us into financial crisis and recession, Tory politicians and right-wing newspapers aimed to deflect popular anger on to public-sector workers. They eagerly pointed out that, while stock-market falls and near-zero interest rates had slashed the value of most private-sector pensions, teachers, nurses, firefighters and local government bureaucrats continued to enjoy the prospect of a "gold-plated" retirement, on up to half their final salaries, with ample protection from inflation.

Government measures, notably changing the inflation index used in calculating payments, have already cut their value by around 25 per cent. But ministers reckon there is mileage in continuing the jihad.

Second, pension obligations are the biggest barrier to more privatising and outsourcing of public-sector services. Public services, we are repeatedly told, are run for the employees, not the public. They are being "reformed" so that they can be run for the benefit of capital.