Thursday 3 December 2009

Speak Up

Anne McElvoy and I went to the same school, but if we were the only two such people whom you had ever met...

You may even be able to buy the Evening Standard in Buckingham, so let this interview with Sally Bercow go out as a clarion call to everyone in the Speaker's constituency who is appalled that the old student sectarian Marxists of New Labour have installed the old Secretary of the Race and Repatriation Committee of the Monday Club, and called that, like so many other such arrangements, "the centre ground". Clearly, his marriage is an example of that same pernicious alliance, by which we are now governed without challenge.

Well, there are challenges, here and there. As much as anything else, the election of Nigel Farage would send the signal that UKIP was better off, not as a Tory pressure group lighting candles before icons of Margaret "Single European Act" Thatcher, but as a coalition of Old Tories, Old Labourites and Old Liberals who agreed, not just about the EU, but also about the threats to our sovereignty from America, Israel, the Gulf monarchies and global capital, so that it opposed the neoconservative wars abroad, and therefore also the neoconservative war against liberty at home. And as a movement as much in favour of grammar schools as in favour of British independence.

Thus would that election contribute, directly or indirectly, to the re-emergence of parliamentary representation in the tradition of the Attlee Government's refusal to join the European Coal and Steel Community on the grounds that it was "the blueprint for a federal state" which "the Durham miners would never wear". Of Gaitskell's rejection of European federalism as "the end of a thousand years of history" and liable to destroy the Commonwealth. Of the votes of most Labour MPs, and one Liberal, against Heath's Treaty of Rome. Of the Parliamentary Labour Party’s unanimous opposition to Thatcher's Single European Act. Of the 66 Labour MPs who voted against Maastricht, including, in Bryan Gould, the only resignation from either front bench in order to do so, while Nick Harvey also voted against and Simon Hughes abstained. And of the votes of every Labour and Liberal Democrat MP, without exception, against the Common Agricultural and Fisheries Policies annually between 1979 and 1997.

Parliamentary representation in the tradition of that half of the French Socialist Party which successfully opposed the EU Constitution. Of that half of the UKIP vote which, based on its geographical distribution, must be Old Labour or Old Liberal rather than Old Tory. And of the No2EU – Yes To Democracy list at the 2009 European Elections, which in London included Peter Shore's erstwhile agent, and which in the North West included the immediate past Leader of the Liberal Party.

And parliamentary representation no less in the tradition of Ministerial defence of the grammar schools by "Red Ellen" Wilkinson of the Jarrow Crusade, and by George Tomlinson. Of their academic defence by Sidney Webb and R H Tawney. Of their vigorous practical defence by Labour councillors and activists around the country, not least while Thatcher, as Education Secretary, was closing so many that there were not enough left at the end for her record ever to be equalled. Of their protection in Kent by a campaign long spearheaded by Eric Hammond. Of their restoration by popular demand, as soon as the Berlin Wall came down, in what is still the very left-wing former East Germany. And of their successful popular defence in the Social Democratic heartland of North Rhine-Westphalia.

Buckingham, speak for the nation.

24 comments:

  1. Why did you never join Ukip?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Because it was always going to become what it has now become. The challenge was always going to be reaching those thus left behind, disenfranchised all over again. Among the far more numerous others of similar mind who were never UKIP supporters, since they always could see where it was bound to end up: right where it has ended up.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Two options for any party of protest/party of attempted re-alignment. Either it has to remain single-issue, essentially just a pressure group (possibly putting pressure on all the major parties, possibly just on one) but limiting its appeal to those who really care about that one issue. Or it has to become a party with wider policies, which risk putting off parts of its natual support. A quasi-Tory UKIP will struggle to keep it's left-wing voters. And a quasi-Old Labour UKIP would struggle to keep its right-wing voters.

    It's not an easy call. Single-issue groups are difficult to sustain, partly I suspect because their voters are still looking to other parties for policies on other issues, so the single-issue party finds it hard to build loyalty. And so most apparently-single-issue groups seem not to be able to resist developing the full range of policies.

    The "main" parties' loyal voters meanwhile have already made their compromises, and though with gritted teeth have decided that they prefer (say) a Tory government. So they (we) carry on voting for some unsavoury candidates for the admittedly limited aim of changing the government ever so slightly for the better. Hardly utopian, I know, but a realistic prospect. It won't apply in Buckingham, though.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You have more chance of winning NW Durham than Farage has in Buckingham. And I mean that dismissively to Farage, not supportively to you.

    ReplyDelete
  5. At least Farage and I are candidates. Just as there is no Tory candidate in Buckingham, there is no Labour candidate here. In December. With talk today (although I'm not convinced, but that's not the point) of an Election in March.

    If I don't win, then the Lib Dems will, as anyone in the local Labour Party will tell you face-to-face. None of them is going to sign the nomination papers of the New Labour Princess. Will anyone? Will that be what does for her? I'd be surprised, but not extremely so.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The Mail and the Telegraph are all set to endorse Farage at Buckingham. That's most newspapers bought there, with no Tory candidate this time. Bercow is toast.

    ReplyDelete
  7. "If I don't win, then the Lib Dems will, as anyone in the local Labour Party will tell you face-to-face"

    I thought there was no question in your mind that you would win, as you have said so repeatedly. Softening expectations??

    ReplyDelete
  8. "The Mail and the Telegraph are all set to endorse Farage at Buckingham"

    No, they're not.

    ReplyDelete
  9. "No, they're not"

    They have practically done it already.

    "I thought there was no question in your mind that you would win"

    Oh, there's none in mine.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Yes they are. Bercow is not running as a Tory, and even if he were.

    ReplyDelete
  11. "No, they're not"

    They have practically done it already


    Again - no they haven't. But there is also a world of difference between tacitly supporting an alternative candidate, and officially endorsing them. Both papers will come out very strongly for the Conservatives, and stay silent on Buckingham. And Bercow will win by a landslide, including taking almost all of the Tory votes. Anyone saying any different is living in fantasy land.

    ReplyDelete
  12. "Both papers will come out very strongly for the Conservatives"

    Oh no they won't. Not this time.

    ReplyDelete
  13. If by bunker you mean "living in Buckingham" then sure. Of course, I'm sure living in NW Durham and having absolutely no affinity or history with Conservative polciies and within Conservative circles gives you a much better perspective than that.

    ReplyDelete
  14. The ultimate riposte to New Labour's parting installation of the Tories' least favourite Tory as Speaker. No need to remove him on the floor of the House because the voters will already have removed him at the ballot box. Why aren't the Tories pleased?

    No answer to your question about who the hell is going to campiagn for your Labour opponent if there ever even is one.

    ReplyDelete
  15. ""Both papers will come out very strongly for the Conservatives"

    Oh no they won't. Not this time."

    Well its difficult to argue with the evident expertise of a man / woman who comments anonymously on a minor blog - but yes, they will. What else will they do?

    Of course, they'll save themselves space to endorse David in NW Durham (ha!)

    ReplyDelete
  16. "having absolutely no affinity or history with Conservative polciies and within Conservative circles"

    Oh, sweetie, if you only knew...

    "Why aren't the Tories pleased?"

    Why not, indeed...

    If no New Labour stay-behind agent in the Speaker's Chair, then why any New Labour stay-behind agent in Number 10?

    "No answer to your question about who the hell is going to campiagn for your Labour opponent if there ever even is one"

    Or even sign her nomination papers.

    I've never seen them so angry. Never. And I never thought I'd see the day when the people who initiated me into the omerta of local politics would be all over the local and even national media saying that they were not going to support the offical candidate.

    They would never dream of not voting, and would find it very hard not to campaign. They would never dream of voting Tory or Lib Dem. And I am their made man. They certainly know where I am...

    ReplyDelete
  17. A minor blog? As the great man himself might put, oh sweetie if you only knew.

    ReplyDelete
  18. What do "Conservative circles" have to do with it? There is no Conservative candidate.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Et the Buckingham Bercowite who pretends like Bercow to be a Tory is clearly very angry indeed that his hero (employer?) is going to lose his seat, which he is. Go Farage!

    ReplyDelete
  20. Again, difficult to argue with people who use such devestating ripostes as "sweetie, if only you knew". So far I've seen little evidence that anyone knows anything about the Buckingham constituency, electorate, MP, or quite frankly UK politics in general. If the confidence that David will win Durham NW is the same as the confidence that Farage will win, then good luck wih that...

    ReplyDelete
  21. If you think that luck enters into this, then you are going to need a hell of a lot of it.

    ReplyDelete
  22. I think that the 40+ local party members who were at a north west durham labour party fundraiser might disagree with you about there being no members to support the new candidate....but again dont let fact get in the way of your stories....

    ReplyDelete
  23. There are members and members, as you are clearly the sort of person who understands.

    ReplyDelete