What are the Lib Dems? Why are the Lib Dems? If they did not exist, then would anyone bother to invent them?
It is easy to say to someone like Jeremy Browne that he knows that he could never make it in the much larger field of the Conservative Party, so he is a Lib Dem with an eye on a hung Parliament or on a small majority for one of the two major parties.
It is easy to say to someone like Tim Farron that he knows that he could never make it in the much larger field of the Labour Party, so he is a Lib Dem with an eye on a hung Parliament or on a small majority for one of the two major parties.
It is easy to say that Nick Clegg not merely would be, but is, a failed Conservative apparatchik, just as the man whom he beat for Lib Dem Leader, Chris Huhne, not merely would have been, but was, a failed Labour activist once he had joined that party along with the rest of the International Marxist Group.
Yet somehow this does not quite work, especially on the Lib Dem Left. Farron, or Simon Hughes, or Steve Webb, is somehow not quite imaginable as a Labour figure. He could only be a Lib Dem.
Never discount the social and cultural side of these things, either. That is also true of Labour politicians who might ostensibly just as easily be Conservatives, and of Conservatives who might ostensibly just easily be Labour. Except when done very early in life, few people who have made such leaps have found the experience agreeable.
There are still going to be 30 Lib Dem MPs come May. That is largely Labour's fault. Thanks to the Coalition, it could have taken scores of seats that it could never previously have considered, nor will be able to do so again for half a century if it does not take them next year, including most of those which currently return Lib Dems.
It has failed to select the strong local candidates necessary, with or without prior party allegiance, or to spend the necessary cash, which everyone from the unions to Lords Sainsbury and Sugar have in abundance.
In the way that the ideologically coherent and organisationally disciplined Communist Party used to be a moderating influence on the much more freewheeling Labour Left, so Labour could be a moderating influence on the Greens and on the decidedly similar left wing of the Lib Dems.
Might the Conservatives moderate the Lib Dem Right? That is mostly patrician Whigs without any such need. As for the rest, people in the vein of Mark Littlewood, if they were Conservatives, then they would now be defecting to UKIP. But probably not finding it very conducive, as Douglas Carswell and Mark Reckless will not, and as the self-styled "Radical Whig" Daniel Hannan would not.
UKIP is not a classical liberal, a libertarian or a Radical Whig party in the way that Marxist parties are Marxist. It is more a vehicle for a lower-middle-class populist Right that may defend or promote individual policies informed by, or at least compatible with, such a position, but which has read little or no such literature, which would be alienated and even disgusted by a very great deal of it, and which would certainly not always, or even ordinarily, agree with many of the logical conclusions of a classical liberal, a libertarian or a Radical Whig ideology.
In that sense, UKIP is much more akin to the (also very anti-EU) working-class populist Left of Dennis Skinner or Ronnie Campbell, which may defend or promote individual policies informed by, or at least compatible with, a Marxist position, but which has read little or no such literature, which would be alienated and even disgusted by a very great deal of it, and which would certainly not always, or even ordinarily, agree with many of the logical conclusions of a Marxist ideology.
If anyone ever did create a party specifically for that working-class populist Left, and the inherent unlikelihood of that is compounded by the fact that those who adhere to it are Labour in the way that the Basques are Basque, then Marxists would not be happy in that party, and would be most unlikely to last very long in it.
Likewise, classical liberals, libertarians or Radical Whigs would not, and will not, be happy in UKIP, and are most unlikely to last very long in it. That includes the incumbent for whom this insurrection is about to secure re-election for a few final months.
But the ones in the Lib Dems are always going to be in the Lib Dems. Somehow, they could never quite be anything else.
But the ones in the Lib Dems are always going to be in the Lib Dems. Somehow, they could never quite be anything else.
I broadly agree with this blog, which is unusual for me. The LibDems, market or social certainly have a legitimate place within the modern, multi-party political spectrum. However, I take issue with your supposition that Labour can win seats from LibDems that they've never won before. I don't know exactly which ones you mean, but given that they're clearly no party is ever going to ever get more than 45% of the popular vote in any national election for the forseeable to distant future, I highly doubt they can win seats they didn't win comfortably in 1997 or 2001, for example, when they had 43.8% of the vote, nor do I think the Tories will ever fall far enough (in a general election) to facilitate gains in places like Somerton & Frome, where even at its 1997 peak Labour won just 16.3% of the vote (or do you predict that politics will become so fragmented that a good candidate could take the seat on less than 20% of the vote), or even Westmoreland, where in 1997 they won less than 21% of the vote. These usually Conservative areas are where the vast majority of LibDem MPs represent .If you are referring to the traditional Liberal hinterlands, you should already know that most have had Labour MPs since 1979, a good example being the highland seat around Inverness East or Cornwall's Falmouth & Cambourne.
ReplyDeleteThere is no point in voting for either Coalition party against the other, and much of what the Coalition has done to rural areas, not least in the West Country and in the Highlands which were already poor anyway, could have been exploited this time in order to make inroads.
DeleteBut Labour nationally could not be bothered to give the necessary support to what are often barely existent local parties.
It is still going to win. But this particular chance will not come again in 50 years, if ever. Labour could have wiped the Lib Dems off the map, and given the Conservatives the biggest shock that they had ever had as they lost seats that had stayed blue even in 1945.
Ho, hum.
No wonder your enemies hate you. Damian Thompson, Oliver Kamm, Jonathan Simons, Neil Fleming, that boy at ITV who used to be at Sky, none of them would know which way up to hold this never mind be able to write it.
Delete