Michael Meacher writes:
Ha-Joon
Chang in The Guardian is
right that “the country is in desperate
need of a counter narrative” to the Tory story on the economy.
I believe it should go like this.
I believe it should go like this.
First,
Labour did not leave behind an economic mess; the bankers did.
Labour was not profligate: the biggest Labour deficit in the pre-crash years was 3.3% of GDP; the Thatcher-Major governments racked up deficits bigger than that in 10 of their 18 years.
Labour was not profligate: the biggest Labour deficit in the pre-crash years was 3.3% of GDP; the Thatcher-Major governments racked up deficits bigger than that in 10 of their 18 years.
So who was the profligate? It’s a no-brainer.
Second, the Tories have claimed
that the reason for enforced austerity is to pay down the deficit.
Yet, after
six years of falling wages, private investment flat, productivity on the floor,
and fast-rising trade deficits, the deficit is £100bn, when Osborne promised in
2010 it would now be next to zero.
To cap it all, the deficit will almost
certainly rise this year because income from taxes has sharply fallen as wages
are increasingly squeezed.
Austerity is now a busted policy that has turned
toxic. It should be dropped.
Third, Osborne’s so-called
recovery is bogus because it is too dependent on a housing asset bubble, too
dependent on financial services rather than manufacturing, and has no demand to
sustain it.
It is already fading as growth slows.
Fourth, the only way now to get
the deficit down is by public investment to kickstart sustainable growth via
housebuilding, upgrading infrastructure, and greening the economy.
Funding a
£30bn package at interest rates of £150m a year would create 1.5m jobs within
two/three years.
Or it could be financed without any increase in public
borrowing by printing money, or instructing the publicly owned banks to
concentrate lending on British industry, or taxing the 0.1% ultra-rich whose
wealth has doubled since the crash.
People need hope.
The Tories are
continuing with austerity because their real motive is to shrink the state and
public services, not to cut the deficit.
The alternative offers investment
desperately needed, growth in the real economy, genuine jobs, rising wages –
and really will pay down the deficit.
No comments:
Post a Comment