Tuesday, 28 October 2014

Desperate To Believe

The Morning Star editorialises:

Both Billy Hayes and the Communication Workers Union that he leads have long-standing well-deserved reputations for opposing racism.

However, he is wrong to bracket Ukip with the British National Party in identifying Nigel Farage’s outfit as a racist party.

As Communist Party general secretary Rob Griffiths points out, Ukip rhetoric on immigration means that it attracts a number of racist votes.

However, unlike the BNP which always had racism, anti-semitism, Islamophobia, stiff-armed salutes and a nostalgia for genocide in its DNA, Ukip plays the democracy game by the rules and has proved adept at casting itself as an anti-Establishment protest movement.

It also differs from the BNP in having black members in leading positions and in not opposing all immigration, backing a points-based system similar to that of Australia.

To treat the BNP and Ukip as racist parties scarcely distinguishable from each other would require a similar “no platform” policy towards Ukip as labour movement anti-racists deployed against the BNP, which would be an absurdity.

The main reason for Ukip’s rapid rise is the sense of betrayal and alienation that many voters feel about the entire Westminster political caste.

The Tories are losing many votes to Ukip, largely over the European Union, but Labour too is under pressure because, as many ex-Labour voters say, the party no longer gives a toss for the working class.

Outgoing Scottish Labour leader Johann Lamont’s farewell comments spoke volumes about the refusal of the party in London to recognise that things are changing and that people will no longer accept edicts from the Westminster ivory tower.

The centralist grip that Tony Blair, Peter Mandelson and the rest of the new Labour clique imposed on the party has not been broken.

Westminster in-crowd hangers-on continue to be parachuted into safe seats, knowing nothing of local history, problems or hopes.

Farage and his crew have successfully mobilised the people left behind by the shiny suits, persuading them that Ukip will represent them.

It won’t, because the Ukip leader is as much an Establishment figure as David Cameron — privately educated, rich and a City slicker — but such is the political alienation felt by many voters that they are desperate to believe.

Farage has always insisted that he is an unashamed Thatcherite, so his priorities are a slimmed-down state, tax cuts for the rich, reduced spending on public services and hostility to “red tape” such as health and safety legislation.

The more widely that these policies are publicised the more likely that working-class votes can be mobilised against them — but only if there is a real alternative posed to Ukip’s free-market fanaticism.

Unfortunately, when Labour frontbenchers admit to having failed to listen to their working-class voters, they only seem to have immigration in mind.

Talking tougher on immigration is not only wrong but self-defeating, as Norwich South Labour parliamentary candidate Clive Lewis makes clear. 

The Tories and Ukip will always be trusted more by voters whose main motivation is clamping down on Romanians and Bulgarians coming to Britain.

Labour’s uncritical acceptance of EU directives and European Court of Justice rulings in the Viking, Ruffert, Laval and Luxembourg cases, which undermine workplace rights, would also offer Ukip an open goal.

If Labour makes a pro-EU line its campaigning priority and insults voters attracted to Ukip by tarring them with a racist brush, it will lose next May and will deserve to do so.

12 comments:

  1. "It won't...because the Ukip leader is as much an Establishment figure as David Cameron — privately educated, rich and a City slicker".

    What a load of utter bilge. So privately-educated people have never defied the Establishment, right?

    Westminster School-educated Tony Benn, Hugh Gaitskell, Michael Foot indeed factory-owning Friedrich Engels?

    Does this class-warrior rag even know anything about its own side's history?

    Many of the greatest socialists were wealthy and privately educated.

    Using that against Farage is worse than pathetic. It's embarrassingly ill-informed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. None of them ever sold himself as an Everyman. Farage is trying to do so. But he just isn't.

      Delete
  2. As you have often asked without answer, Mr. L., what is it specifically about the EU that Ukip disagrees with? There's nothing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They are annoyed that the EU is destroying workers' rights, public services, and consumer and environmental protection, when they themselves had wanted to do so.

      UKIP has re-elected an incumbent against whom it did not field a candidate in 2010, and it is about to repeat that not very impressive trick. So what?

      Delete
  3. Anon 28 October.

    Beyond parody.

    If it was a serious question, however, then you've never read anything about the EU, never mind UKIP.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Let us begin with the European Court of Justice rulings in the Viking, Ruffert, Laval and Luxembourg cases.

      What is UKIP's problem, not with the form, but with the substance? What, exactly? And why, exactly?

      Delete
    2. You're having a laugh, Mr. L. No-one in Ukip has ever heard of any of those. They are nothing but pub bores who have somehow managed to get on telly. Cheap to make, I suppose. Stick a camera in a saloon bar and broadcast what was happening anyway. The joke is wearing off though. Time to put something serious on instead.

      Delete
    3. I have a feeling that reality television is close to having run its course.

      That will be the end, not only of UKIP (which you correctly identify as an example of the genre), but even of the people in it.

      What will become of them, if there is no Strictly Come Dancing or I'm A Celebrity, Get Me Out of Here for them to go to?

      Delete
  4. Ukip want to privatise the NHS and abolish paid holidays, maternity leave and everything else. They don't want to be beaten to these things by the EU and TTIP.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Indeed, they do not.

      As soon as the EU came after the NHS, which it was always going to do eventually, then that was always going to be the beginning of the end of the EU in Britain, which culturally British people regard as more or less synonymous with the NHS.

      Look at how its fate decided the Scottish independence referendum. The question might as well have been, "Would Scottish independence be better for the NHS?"

      ("Anglosphere" weirdoes are a different story, but there are next to none of those beyond the outer fringes of the media.)

      That day is very nearly upon us.

      Delete
    2. And the next General Election is going to be fought on that issue, the issue Labour can't lose on because it's Labour and bound to be more trusted with the NHS than the Tories. Already happening, it's going to be all about the NHS, Labour's trump card issue for as long as anyone can remember.

      Delete
    3. Yes, that is already happening. They have done very well on that.

      But they need to sort themselves out over TTIP in order to keep up the momentum on that.

      Still, as you say, Labour, simply because it is Labour, cannot lose on the NHS.

      The Conservatives used to have issues like that (the economy, defence, law and order), but they no longer have them.

      Delete