Both Billy Hayes and the Communication Workers Union that he
leads have long-standing well-deserved reputations for opposing racism.
However, he is wrong to bracket Ukip with the British National Party in identifying Nigel Farage’s outfit as a racist party.
As Communist Party
general secretary Rob Griffiths points out, Ukip rhetoric on immigration means
that it attracts a number of racist votes.
However, unlike the
BNP which always had racism, anti-semitism, Islamophobia, stiff-armed salutes
and a nostalgia for genocide in its DNA, Ukip plays the democracy game by the
rules and has proved adept at casting itself as an anti-Establishment protest
movement.
It also differs
from the BNP in having black members in leading positions and in not opposing
all immigration, backing a points-based system similar to that of Australia.
To treat the BNP
and Ukip as racist parties scarcely distinguishable from each other would
require a similar “no platform” policy towards Ukip as labour movement
anti-racists deployed against the BNP, which would be an absurdity.
The main reason for
Ukip’s rapid rise is the sense of betrayal and alienation that many voters feel
about the entire Westminster political caste.
The Tories are
losing many votes to Ukip, largely over the European Union, but Labour too is
under pressure because, as many ex-Labour voters say, the party no longer gives
a toss for the working class.
Outgoing Scottish
Labour leader Johann Lamont’s farewell comments spoke volumes about the refusal
of the party in London to recognise that things are changing and that people
will no longer accept edicts from the Westminster ivory tower.
The centralist grip
that Tony Blair, Peter Mandelson and the rest of the new Labour clique imposed
on the party has not been broken.
Westminster
in-crowd hangers-on continue to be parachuted into safe seats, knowing nothing
of local history, problems or hopes.
Farage and his crew
have successfully mobilised the people left behind by the shiny suits,
persuading them that Ukip will represent them.
It won’t, because
the Ukip leader is as much an Establishment figure as David Cameron — privately
educated, rich and a City slicker — but such is the political alienation felt
by many voters that they are desperate to believe.
Farage has always
insisted that he is an unashamed Thatcherite, so his priorities are a
slimmed-down state, tax cuts for the rich, reduced spending on public services
and hostility to “red tape” such as health and safety legislation.
The more widely
that these policies are publicised the more likely that working-class votes can
be mobilised against them — but only if there is a real alternative posed to
Ukip’s free-market fanaticism.
Unfortunately, when
Labour frontbenchers admit to having failed to listen to their working-class
voters, they only seem to have immigration in mind.
Talking tougher on
immigration is not only wrong but self-defeating, as Norwich South Labour
parliamentary candidate Clive Lewis makes clear.
The Tories and Ukip
will always be trusted more by voters whose main motivation is clamping down on
Romanians and Bulgarians coming to Britain.
Labour’s uncritical
acceptance of EU directives and European Court of Justice rulings in the
Viking, Ruffert, Laval and Luxembourg cases, which undermine workplace rights,
would also offer Ukip an open goal.
If Labour makes a
pro-EU line its campaigning priority and insults voters attracted to Ukip by
tarring them with a racist brush, it will lose next May and will deserve to do
so.
"It won't...because the Ukip leader is as much an Establishment figure as David Cameron — privately educated, rich and a City slicker".
ReplyDeleteWhat a load of utter bilge. So privately-educated people have never defied the Establishment, right?
Westminster School-educated Tony Benn, Hugh Gaitskell, Michael Foot indeed factory-owning Friedrich Engels?
Does this class-warrior rag even know anything about its own side's history?
Many of the greatest socialists were wealthy and privately educated.
Using that against Farage is worse than pathetic. It's embarrassingly ill-informed.
None of them ever sold himself as an Everyman. Farage is trying to do so. But he just isn't.
DeleteAs you have often asked without answer, Mr. L., what is it specifically about the EU that Ukip disagrees with? There's nothing.
ReplyDeleteThey are annoyed that the EU is destroying workers' rights, public services, and consumer and environmental protection, when they themselves had wanted to do so.
DeleteUKIP has re-elected an incumbent against whom it did not field a candidate in 2010, and it is about to repeat that not very impressive trick. So what?
Anon 28 October.
ReplyDeleteBeyond parody.
If it was a serious question, however, then you've never read anything about the EU, never mind UKIP.
Let us begin with the European Court of Justice rulings in the Viking, Ruffert, Laval and Luxembourg cases.
DeleteWhat is UKIP's problem, not with the form, but with the substance? What, exactly? And why, exactly?
You're having a laugh, Mr. L. No-one in Ukip has ever heard of any of those. They are nothing but pub bores who have somehow managed to get on telly. Cheap to make, I suppose. Stick a camera in a saloon bar and broadcast what was happening anyway. The joke is wearing off though. Time to put something serious on instead.
DeleteI have a feeling that reality television is close to having run its course.
DeleteThat will be the end, not only of UKIP (which you correctly identify as an example of the genre), but even of the people in it.
What will become of them, if there is no Strictly Come Dancing or I'm A Celebrity, Get Me Out of Here for them to go to?
Ukip want to privatise the NHS and abolish paid holidays, maternity leave and everything else. They don't want to be beaten to these things by the EU and TTIP.
ReplyDeleteIndeed, they do not.
DeleteAs soon as the EU came after the NHS, which it was always going to do eventually, then that was always going to be the beginning of the end of the EU in Britain, which culturally British people regard as more or less synonymous with the NHS.
Look at how its fate decided the Scottish independence referendum. The question might as well have been, "Would Scottish independence be better for the NHS?"
("Anglosphere" weirdoes are a different story, but there are next to none of those beyond the outer fringes of the media.)
That day is very nearly upon us.
And the next General Election is going to be fought on that issue, the issue Labour can't lose on because it's Labour and bound to be more trusted with the NHS than the Tories. Already happening, it's going to be all about the NHS, Labour's trump card issue for as long as anyone can remember.
DeleteYes, that is already happening. They have done very well on that.
DeleteBut they need to sort themselves out over TTIP in order to keep up the momentum on that.
Still, as you say, Labour, simply because it is Labour, cannot lose on the NHS.
The Conservatives used to have issues like that (the economy, defence, law and order), but they no longer have them.