Why shouldn't the Republican nominee be someone who stated the obvious, that Bush always knew that there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq?
All the more reason for the Democrats to nominate, not someone who voted in favour of that war, but someone who voted against it.
Just as the current Leader of the Labour Party did.
He has been saying from the very start that Blair always knew that there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Again, a statement of the obvious.
I also happen to know that Jeremy Corbyn's continuing campaign and the campaign for Bernie Sanders are in close touch with each other, and that the latter holds that it would have been impossible without the former.
Now, when is the Conservative Party going to complete the quartet and be led by someone who had been right all along about Iraq?
I also happen to know that Jeremy Corbyn's continuing campaign and the campaign for Bernie Sanders are in close touch with each other, and that the latter holds that it would have been impossible without the former.
Now, when is the Conservative Party going to complete the quartet and be led by someone who had been right all along about Iraq?
No comments:
Post a Comment