A global super-rich elite had
at least $21 trillion (£13tn) hidden in secret tax havens by the end of 2010,
according to a major study. The figure is equivalent to the size of the US
and Japanese economies combined. The
Price of Offshore Revisited was written by James Henry, a former chief
economist at the consultancy McKinsey, for the Tax Justice Network.
Tax expert and UK government adviser John Whiting
said he was sceptical that the amount hidden was so large. Mr Whiting, tax policy director at the Chartered
Institute of Taxation, said: "There clearly are some significant amounts
hidden away, but if it really is that size what is being done with it
all?"
Mr Henry said his $21tn is actually a
conservative figure and the true scale could be $32tn. A trillion is 1,000
billion. Mr Henry used data from the Bank of International
Settlements, International Monetary Fund, World Bank, and national governments. His study deals only with financial wealth
deposited in bank and investment accounts, and not other assets such as
property and yachts.
The report comes amid growing public and
political concern about tax avoidance and evasion. Some authorities, including
in Germany, have even paid for information on alleged tax evaders stolen from
banks. The group that commissioned the report, Tax Justice
Network, campaigns against tax havens. Mr Henry said that the super-rich move money
around the globe through an "industrious bevy of professional enablers in
private banking, legal, accounting and investment industries.
"The lost tax revenues implied by our
estimates is huge. It is large enough to make a significant difference to the
finances of many countries. From another angle, this study is really
good news. The world has just located a huge pile of financial wealth that
might be called upon to contribute to the solution of our most pressing global
problems," he said.
The report highlights the impact on the balance
sheets of 139 developing countries of money held in tax havens that is put
beyond the reach of local tax authorities. Mr Henry estimates that since the 1970s, the
richest citizens of these 139 countries had amassed $7.3tn to $9.3tn of
"unrecorded offshore wealth" by 2010. Private wealth held offshore represents "a
huge black hole in the world economy," Mr Henry said.
Mr Whiting, though, urged caution. "I cannot
disprove the figures at all, but they do seem staggering. If the suggestion is
that such amounts are actively hidden and never accessed, that seems odd - not
least in terms of what the tax authorities are doing. In fact, the US, UK and
German authorities are doing a lot." He also pointed out that if tax havens were
stuffed with such sizeable amounts, "you would expect the havens to be
more conspicuously wealthy than they are".
Other findings in Mr Henry's report include:
- At the end of 2010, the 50 leading private banks alone collectively managed more than $12.1tn in cross-border invested assets for private clients
- The three private banks handling the most assets offshore are UBS, Credit Suisse and Goldman Sachs
- Less than 100,000 people worldwide own about $9.8tn of the wealth held offshore.
Mr Henry told the BBC that it was difficult to
detail hidden assets in some individual countries, including the UK, because of
restrictions on getting access to data. A spokesman for the Treasury said great strides
were being made in cracking down on people hiding assets. He said that in 2011-12 HM Revenue & Customs'
High Net Worth Unit secured £200m in additional tax through its compliance work
with the very wealthy. He said that agreements reached with
Liechtenstein and Switzerland will bring in £3bn and between £4bn and £7bn
respectively.
In return for the stamping out of all provision for the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories to function as tax havens (which not that all of them are – my native Saint Helena, for example, is not), students from those Dependencies and Territories must be recognised as home students.
As part of a particular advocacy on behalf of their British people, the airport must be built on Saint Helena, there must be justice for Ascension Island and for the Chagos Islands, and there must be no concession whatever, whether on the sovereignty of Gibraltar, or on either the sovereignty or the oil revenue of the Falkland Islands.
In return for the stamping out of all provision for the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories to function as tax havens (which not that all of them are – my native Saint Helena, for example, is not), students from those Dependencies and Territories must be recognised as home students.
As part of a particular advocacy on behalf of their British people, the airport must be built on Saint Helena, there must be justice for Ascension Island and for the Chagos Islands, and there must be no concession whatever, whether on the sovereignty of Gibraltar, or on either the sovereignty or the oil revenue of the Falkland Islands.
Ed Miliband, Jon Cruddas and Maurice Glasman, over to you.
A paid research is always biased.
ReplyDeleteThanks David. Yes, be great to get both sides of the story. Henry is a little sensational which is pretty effective.
ReplyDelete