With a particularly brilliant ending, Peter Hitchens writes:
As the age of sexual consent is 16, what are state employees doing fitting contraceptive implants in 13-year-old girls? Aren’t they colluding in a criminal act? These sinister devices are a clear admission by the Government. It actually expects these children to have unlawful sexual intercourse, and wants to make it easy for them. How strange, given that the one crime we all disapprove of utterly and completely is paedophilia. Even convicted gangsters, rapists, burglars and muggers look down on the paedophiles in their midst (they have another word for them, as they cannot spell or pronounce the official term).
Those who engage in paedophilia are often also accused of ‘grooming’, preparing their victims for violation and abuse. Yet here we have a policy that directly condones and encourages the sexualisation of children, and is at the very least comparable to the ‘grooming’ we are all so shocked by. What child, equipped with this rather revolting chemical lump or dose, would not grasp that she was expected by the authorities to act accordingly? I would be very interested to know exactly what the victims of this scheme are told, and how they are chosen.
This thing is done by doctors and nurses, supposedly symbols of rectitude and mercy. It often takes place in schools, where our children are meant to be safe from molesters. It is protected by law. It is paid for by your taxes and mine, extracted under the threat of prison. Perhaps most sinister of all, it is – like all child-molesting – ‘our little secret’. The girls’ parents are not asked their permission beforehand for their daughters to be corrupted by our sick state. Nor are they told afterwards. This is both totalitarian and evil.
The judges are always ready to confirm that this is no longer a Christian country in anything but name, and did so again on Friday – though I do wonder where they think our laws and their powers come from. But it is much worse than that. We are turning into a sort of Babylon, only with drizzle and sleet. Almost every sexual practice and habit – with the single exception of faithful marriage – is now encouraged by the state. First, the state poisons young minds with so-called sex-education, which is now unleashed in primary schools. Then, when the poor things act on what they have been told, doctors push chemical anti-baby capsules under their skin. I believe this sort of thing is known as ‘harm reduction’.
It all depends what you mean by harm. Having privatised the telephones, electricity and the railways, we have nationalised paedophilia.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I have been arguing this position for years among my peers. A paedophile is consumed by sexual thoughts about young children and is content to groom them over a period of years. Most 'normal' healthy adults do not spend their days writing books, or preparing film shows for children about sexual activity, and certainly would not consider showing these to young children, often in mixed classes, at a vulnerable age in their emotional development. And yet the people who are the leaders in this field, the 'professionals', are lauded and very well paid for their supposed care for the welfare of children.
ReplyDeleteBecause I have contact with children occasionally, I have to obtain a certificate to prove that I am a safe person in their vicinity. If I had been found making drawings in my own home on the lines as found in some of these text books I would instantly become a pariah, labelled as dangerous, and forbidden evermore to be near children. And yet because these books, DVDs, and implants have come from the 'professionals' they are welcomed as being good for children.
In my opinion, anyone who spends their days, weeks, months, and years working on sex programmes for young children, must be considered dangerous and mentally unstable.
People have been prosecuted when they have taken their computers for repair and disturbing images have been found on the hard disk. I wonder what kind of images would be found on the hard disks of these caring professionals, because you can be sure that all kinds of material is stored before the final text and drawings are sent to the publisher.
If the government really does wish to engage in harm reduction then its first act should be to sweep away these dangerous people and make a bonfire of their perverted material. Then they should apply the law of the land and place the emphasis in schools on abstinence rather than 'safe sex', a convenient slogan for the sex industry to make fortunes.